No matter what 95% of video games are an art form if not 99%/100% for that matter.
Basically anything in Entertainment is art for the most part.
https://www.lexico.com/definition/art
Art - the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power.
95%-99% of anything in the Entertainment realm is art alone.
elegance - classy
corrupted
I have a theory myself
I'm trying to prove basically everything in the Entertainment realm is in the art realm of if not expression (art) realm alone.
Basically every video game is art off definition alone.
It depends on the words around ART though.
Art
Now someone might say that's not art, but it falls under definition and such alone (plus perception to as well).
https://cdn.thinglink.me/api/image/583113889374273536/1240/10/scaletowidth
first video is wretched to warn - both of these are examples of "art" - they fall under the definition of "art" alone.
"Dead space 2 - daycare scene" Vs. "Catholic Cathedrals"
Dead space 2 - daycare scene - wretched - corrupted art
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L14IrML31Ko
Catholic Cathedrals - classy - not corrupted art
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OhnydLHX_u4
dead space 2 - daycare scene
corrupted "art" - evil if not up to wicked art. terrible representation of an art form if not a wretched representation of an art form. corruption of the human mind and it's art that goes way too far to me personally. it's mostly a waste of time that just rots the mind especially in the long run (don't want to fill your mind with that type of stuff / type art). not worth it to even waste time on as an art form for the most part other than signifying that it's wretched art for the most part and/or an example of filthy / disgusting and/or filthy disgusting wretched art for that matter.
See what people really think.
ask people randomly what they think of something like the "dead space 2 - daycare scene"
X = what they say.
X = That's not art - it's wretched disgusting filth that belongs in the trash.
So they expressed (art) themselves or what X said themselves saying it was wretched if not disgusting trash and such.
I come along and rewrite it myself
X = That's not art - it's wretched disgusting filth that belongs in the trash.
It's wretched disgusting filth in the art realm the type of art that belongs in the trash.
I rewrote what they said and asked them if they could agree and such.
--- what I wrote from them above. ---
Y = what I rewrote it as after what they said for X.
Y = It's wretched disgusting filth in the art realm... the type of art that belongs in the trash.
ask them if they could agree with Y or what I rewrote it to.
It's basically an art form that is corrupted and/or is a corruption of the human mind and it belongs in the trash due to it being wretched disgusting filth.
Oh absolutely. If a painting of soup cans passes as art, surely the beautiful imagery of a video game would qualify as well. I'll accept Pack-Man Q*Bert and Moon Patrol as art without hesitation (it has nothing to do with the level of technology). I'll go further and say it's a very underappreciated form of art. It takes a lot of skill to design a game and implement it in code (early game devs had to work in assembly language and sometimes even circuit design). And it's not just a matter of the looks and sounds, the gameplay can make you feel certain things such as surprise, excitement, relief and accomplishment on a level you wouldn't get from other medium. It doesn't even take a story to do it. A great painter can make you say "wow! how did he do that?", a great game designer can make you say "wow, I finally did it!".
it's the English definition as well as perception (not everyone can do art or take it serious).
English definition it all (entertainment realm - expressing one self) appears to fall under art alone.
It's basically 500 words at that point. I can't stop thinking about different words and/or adjectives I think it is alone if not other stuff.
If you did 500-1000 words against each other alone.
Funny Vs. Serious
Stupid Vs. Serious
Funny Vs. Stupid
Serious (used 1 way) Vs. Serious (used the 2nd way)
Classy Vs. Elegant
Incredible Vs. and/or etc (500-1000 other words).
much of art is perception and what people like or don't like for the most part to me personally.
Mozart is not classical music at all. (making a point) - Now someone would have to prove it without saying it's been accepted by society as a classical music art form for hundreds of years and/or "accepted" by people and/or people in society. They can't use this to say it's a classical music art form.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rb0UmrCXxVA
from above
https://poal.co/s/Programming/137089
variables alone - each word is weighted and/or each word (maybe term) is weighted a specific way alone.
English + Math - variable realm.
specified - "overall"
X = Serious
Y = Funny
Z = Stupid
specified - "serious"
X = Serious (1st way of it being serious)
Y = Serious (2nd way of it being serious)
Z = Serious (3rd way of it being serious)
much of it is user specified (how they receive art themselves personally alone) though, but if everyone is using English it's a start at least.
8 programming languages (variables) alone might be 8 people and they all specify it their own way alone. Variables alone are different for all 8 people (at least somewhere).
8 programming languages (variables) - all people
variables alone might be how they view English words alone themselves to other stuff as well as a start to.
but again they are all different like 8 programming languages, but they all can speak English and/or use variables themselves in their own way.
(post is archived)