Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

457

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

Facinating study. I'm running a triple channel Xeon, and I have noticed a marked benchmark increase when using it in triple as opposed to just dual. I figured it was just the flat increase of another 4 gigs, but I suppose this study would make sense for explaining the increases I saw. That said, it is correct that increasing the mem will strain the clock, especially if your OC. I had to tweak my CAS downward when I swapped over to triple channel

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

In your case the memory bandwidth increased when going from dual to triple channel. That can make a noticeable difference.

[–] • 1 pt

Im not complaining mind you. 6 cores 12 threads for 75 bucks and free memory from discarded rigs from work. Cinebench scores are comparable to i5 or first gen ryzen. If tweaking the mem is the price for that, is gladly pay it again

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt (edited )

Minimal returns, but if you add up all the minimal returns in the gaming realm or computing realm for that matter they seem to add up to 10-35 FPS (35 FPS high side - maybe 25 FPS).

Might be the difference in 5-10 FPS in 4k if not a bit more than to as well.

57 FPS vs. 67 FPS overall in the 4k realm. Might be worth it. I should look into this some time. I need to make a list to see how to true this is or not.