WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

fighter pilots can see at 1/220 to as high as 1/255

http://amo.net/NT/02-21-01FPS.html

from link...

"With our outstanding human visual, we can see in billions of colors (although it has been tested that women see as much as 30% more colors than men do. Our eyes can indeed perceive well over 200 frames per second from a simple little display device (mainly so low because of current hardware, not our own limits)."

The USAF, in testing their pilots for visual response time, used a simple test to see if the pilots could distinguish small changes in light. In their experiment a picture of an aircraft was flashed on a screen in a dark room at 1/220th of a second. Pilots were consistently able to "see" the afterimage as well as identify the aircraft. This simple and specific situation not only proves the ability to percieve 1 image within 1/220 of a second, but the ability to interpret higher FPS.


From the above I go into the world of gaming (the above was just to show - nothing professional). It's possible to see 1/220th or even up to 1/255th (as high as I've heard myself) of a second on a screen from what I understand myself.

240 Hz (up to 240 frames per second)

Max I want to say is around 1/300th to 1/350th the human eye can see to me personally, but IDK. That would also probably be someone kind of rare for the most part to me personally or might just have that ability themselves while others struggle to do this especially as you get more frames per second or go into the 300+ realm alone.

I'm not a professional or anything like that. This is my theory alone. People say 240 Hz monitors are useless for the most part or many do at least, but I think in a video game situation especially a sniper situation the human eye might pick a frame at 1/240th of a second or 1 frame from 240 in a second on a 240 Hz monitor that helps them to get a perfect (basically) snipe on someone or to be able to snipe someone.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ynOxHDFXx0


I think though 120 Hz / 144 Hz works just fine for gaming, but if you wanted to be in the 240 Hz realm for gaming it might help you out one day in a video game (I'd figure it's rare though if not extremely rare).

This is just a theory to as well. It's not meant to be professional just my video game theory and that's it.

Figure it could easily help me in rocket league especially when it comes to the ball updating as fast as possible for my eye (human eye) to be able to see it in the air so I can hit it with my car or vehicle. I don't play many shooters myself anymore or it's rare usually. The one shooter I could of used a 240 Hz monitor for would be PUBG (trying to see the invisible bumps while driving the car at max speed). So I can see the invisible bump and don't flip my car and have it explode after driving for 2 minutes to make the next circle as well as being close to the next circle after that (joking). Why the bikes with the bathtub (1940s slang for sidecar) on the side were always the best.

This is due to how important the time factor is since hitting the ball wrong could easily mess up the entire play while in the air is how I view it myself personally.

My rocket league montage (again). I'm not the best at rocket league (obviously), but I don't have the time to play rocket league for the most part or to play rocket league all the time. Also I forgot to mute the sound while making the video.

https://streamable.com/1yprx


Side note:

I'm at 60 Hz or 60 Frames per second basically with my 4k monitor, but I bought this a year ago when 120 Hz / 144 Hz were really rare for the most part or expensive for that matter. First one didn't come out until May of 2018 and that had a $1,500 price tag or so from what I understand. I bought my monitor in oct / nov of 2018.

I'll probably upgrade to a 5k 120 Hz / 5k 144 Hz at some point and stay with that for a while. Probably can get a decent 5k - 120 Hz or 5k 144 Hz monitor / gaming monitor for under $500 that's 32-34 inch in 2 years or so time frame or around here. Might be longer than that, but I'm just waiting until then. I don't have a 5k camera though myself so there's really no point.

fighter pilots can see at 1/220 to as high as 1/255 http://amo.net/NT/02-21-01FPS.html from link... "With our outstanding human visual, we can see in billions of colors (although it has been tested that women see as much as 30% more colors than men do. Our eyes can indeed perceive well over 200 frames per second from a simple little display device (mainly so low because of current hardware, not our own limits)." The USAF, in testing their pilots for visual response time, used a simple test to see if the pilots could distinguish small changes in light. In their experiment a picture of an aircraft was flashed on a screen in a dark room at 1/220th of a second. Pilots were consistently able to "see" the afterimage as well as identify the aircraft. This simple and specific situation not only proves the ability to percieve 1 image within 1/220 of a second, but the ability to interpret higher FPS. ----- From the above I go into the world of gaming (the above was just to show - nothing professional). It's possible to see 1/220th or even up to 1/255th (as high as I've heard myself) of a second on a screen from what I understand myself. 240 Hz (up to 240 frames per second) Max I want to say is around 1/300th to 1/350th the human eye can see to me personally, but IDK. That would also probably be someone kind of rare for the most part to me personally or might just have that ability themselves while others struggle to do this especially as you get more frames per second or go into the 300+ realm alone. I'm not a professional or anything like that. This is my theory alone. People say 240 Hz monitors are useless for the most part or many do at least, but I think in a video game situation especially a sniper situation the human eye might pick a frame at 1/240th of a second or 1 frame from 240 in a second on a 240 Hz monitor that helps them to get a perfect (basically) snipe on someone or to be able to snipe someone. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ynOxHDFXx0 ----- I think though 120 Hz / 144 Hz works just fine for gaming, but if you wanted to be in the 240 Hz realm for gaming it might help you out one day in a video game (I'd figure it's rare though if not extremely rare). This is just a theory to as well. It's not meant to be professional just my video game theory and that's it. Figure it could easily help me in rocket league especially when it comes to the ball updating as fast as possible for my eye (human eye) to be able to see it in the air so I can hit it with my car or vehicle. I don't play many shooters myself anymore or it's rare usually. The one shooter I could of used a 240 Hz monitor for would be PUBG (trying to see the invisible bumps while driving the car at max speed). So I can see the invisible bump and don't flip my car and have it explode after driving for 2 minutes to make the next circle as well as being close to the next circle after that (joking). Why the bikes with the bathtub (1940s slang for sidecar) on the side were always the best. This is due to how important the time factor is since hitting the ball wrong could easily mess up the entire play while in the air is how I view it myself personally. My rocket league montage (again). I'm not the best at rocket league (obviously), but I don't have the time to play rocket league for the most part or to play rocket league all the time. Also I forgot to mute the sound while making the video. https://streamable.com/1yprx ----- Side note: I'm at 60 Hz or 60 Frames per second basically with my 4k monitor, but I bought this a year ago when 120 Hz / 144 Hz were really rare for the most part or expensive for that matter. First one didn't come out until May of 2018 and that had a $1,500 price tag or so from what I understand. I bought my monitor in oct / nov of 2018. I'll probably upgrade to a 5k 120 Hz / 5k 144 Hz at some point and stay with that for a while. Probably can get a decent 5k - 120 Hz or 5k 144 Hz monitor / gaming monitor for under $500 that's 32-34 inch in 2 years or so time frame or around here. Might be longer than that, but I'm just waiting until then. I don't have a 5k camera though myself so there's really no point.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 1 pt (edited )

I'd be looking for 120 / 144 Hz - I'm not in the realm of a professional gamer. I'd think someone who has a natural ability who also is a professional gamer or in this realm at least may or can benefit from a 120 Hz / 144 Hz upgrade to 240 Hz. Has the eye naturally plus after being a gamer (professional gaming realm) for so long in a certain game where they developed the eye for that game. That allows that person to be able to effectively use an upgrade from 120 Hz / 144 Hz to 240 Hz, but it's only minimal for the most part or might only be useful every week or so for some certain shot in all reality.

I want to do 4k at 120 Hz / 144 Hz for gaming.

5k is more or so 60 Hz (60 FPS) video recording. This wouldn't be for gaming it would be in the realm of 5k video editing.


I have the 2080ti aorus extreme version with 11 GB GDDR6 memory and the AMD R7 3700X. The regular 2080ti has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. This could probably do 80-90 FPS (max) for many games at 4k, but many games would need tweaks and such (even if minor tweaks). Which would depend on the game itself (obviously).

If I wanted to do this for gaming I'd probably want something like a 3080ti aorus extreme version with 12-15 GB of GDDR6 (not sure) memory. That would be for 4k 120 Hz / 4k 144 Hz though and many games would need tweaks I'd imagine in the quality settings to be able to get that done.


4k tomb raider - don't play this game, but this video works as an example.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aznxnYrZxKY

50-60 FPS - same exact card as mine. Some changes I could hit 80-90 FPS max, but going on beyond that or something in that realm wouldn't be worth it I want to say. I'd lose too much I'd think.

[–] 1 pt

We've got directly comparable cards, then. 2080ti EVGA ftw3 ultra.

I had the GTX 1070 EVGA ftw before this card. I decided to change it up this time.

I added the bottom part in the last post.