Hacademics
I was trying to read Mein Kampf back in the day and I still am, it's definitely a long, dry read that in many ways directed at German people, and not a manifesto dedicated to shoving filthy kikes into an oven as they'd like you to believe (would've been better that way imo, that's why Commander Rockwell's books were much more entertaining). I searched through the pdf of a version I have for the word "jew" and its derivatives, and only got 508 matches which is not a lot for a 779 page book.
i found that listening to the audiobook version by thomas daltons to be fairly entertaining, in regards to mein kampf. also, the stalag edition reads better in my opinion.
Poal said I could be the so, as a winner, I did.
Here's your prize!
With a retinue of nonsensical studies, essays and tomes, Boghossian, Pluckose & Lindsey exposed the embarrassment that is the peer review process in this 21st Century. If one is looking for a deep dive into the antecedents and architecture that have lead us to all things woke, DEI & ESG, James Lindsey has been excavating the rotted taproot with the alacrity of an academic scorned. His work is worth checking out.
Lindsey is by far the most well read on this subject. Ive followed him for years and have watched him evolve as he's gone deeper.
But.... I still think he's controlled. I think he exists and is almost promoted because he has never acknowledged that Hitler was before him in criticism of 'cultural marxism'. Lindsey has never acknowledged that 'fascism' is mostly a term for anyone who opposes commie revolutions. Same as 'reactionary' or 'counter revolutionary'
For all his talk about Hegelian dielectrics he leaves out these historical contexts so you stay sandboxed in his little intellectual cul-de-sac
Edit: His book race Marxism is garbage btw. He spends dozens and dozens of pages on (((people))) who were involved in commie horseshit but says antisemitism is bad mmkay. That faggot Murray does the same
if you read mein kampf youll realize he never talks about jews but about communists, who were jews
Peer review is so poor today, it was probably never read. Complex scientific papers commonly pass per review having never been read by a single individual in the field or with the knowledge to understand the paper.
These days, passing peer review likely means the author sucked the right cock rather than it a reflection of good science.
(post is archived)