Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] [Sticky] • 6 pts (edited )

Without censoring:

Edit:

Curiously, it seems they are two different exchanges and not the same one viewed at different times (changed user icons, more likes, etc.).

Notice in the OP's image that in the response there is a colon after "misspelt" and a space after the ", while both the space and the colon are not present in this image.

I don't think this exchange actually happened in reality. Or, if it did, one of these two images is a fake/copycat.

[–] • 3 pts

But is he wrong? Past sexual partners is one thing. 100 of them is another.

[–] • 2 pts

men inherently biologically care about a womans past because paternity tests were never a thing until recently; and the absolute worst thing for a man to do is spend money and years caring for a kid who isn't his. So if a woman sleeps with other guys that drastically increases the chance that a kid she has isn't her husbands. So men have an inherent disgust response to high body counts, women don't have this so they don't understand this dynamic inherently and must be told about it through culture. They know it matters to guys, but not why. Also women pair bond with a guy during climax during sex. The more sex with more different guys they have drastically decreases how loyal they will be to one guy in particular. The stats show that if a girl has been with more than 5 guys, there is an 80% chance she will have filed for divorce within 10 years of a marriage vs if she gets married as a virgin there is an 80% chance she will still be married in 10 years because she won't be thinking that the grass might be greener on the other side, or know that there was some other guy she keeps dreaming of who was better in bed or "the one that got away"

so yes body count matters for real biological reasons, not just feminism or cultural reasons.

[–] • 2 pts

Also, women are genetic chimeras. They carry genetic scraps of every man who's jizzed in them around. (The carry even more DNA scraps from the children they've had.) Every different guy that jizzes in a woman changes her DNA slightly.

[–] • 1 pt

The stats show that if a girl has been with more than 5 guys, there is an 80% chance she will have filed for divorce within 10 years of a marriage vs if she gets married as a virgin there is an 80% chance she will still be married in 10 years because she won't be thinking that the grass might be greener on the other side

"Basically Islam there. Keep the woman in the dark and locked away and she will never even conceive of finding a 'stronger' man." -- Lefty

[–] • 0 pt

What about those who are a virgin and have only had sex with one person - in other words, the person who becomes their husband? Would be interesting to know if those statistics are the same as those who are a virgin until their wedding night, I'd suspect it'd be similar.

[–] • 1 pt

I have not come across a statistic that distinguished between those two situations. But I would also suspect they would be similar.

[–] • 1 pt

I think it'd be similar by virtue of the fact that there's no basis of comparison to previous partners.

[–] • 2 pts

More importantly, who gives a shit about what two people did or did not say on twatter?

Don't waste your time on bullshit like this.

[–] • 2 pts

censoring

I hate you jews so much.

[–] • 1 pt

Women are not strong enough to handle the consequences of their sexual past.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

"Women" are not strong enough to keep their fucking legs together, which won't stop them from oh-so- sanctimoniously judging the character of all men.

These things are not women. They're (((programmed)) idiots.