there is nothing more cringeworthy than having to listen to a stupid fucking nigger pretend to act intelligent
It really is insufferable
Black guy nigger darrell brooks.
How can you know he is a nigger if you didn't know his name before you watched the video? Check mate whitey.
Because I've seen his picture and his actions, know his extensive, decades long criminal history. All blacks are niggers. To claim otherwise is racial cuckoldry.
Speaking of cuckoldry, didn’t this jogger/attorney ask the whitey who opened his door to him (immediately after he ran down people in the streets with his vehicle), to make him a sandwich?
Talk about some shit you’d never live down.
“You opened your front door for him AND made him a sandwich? One more question: when is your transition surgery?”
The funnier part is the nigger has a good argument, but he's too stupid to articulate it.
What he needs to say is, "is it true that at the time you fired the shots you did not know who you were firing at?"
When the cop says that's true, then he has to ask, "And were you later told by another person that the person you shoot at was me?"
When the cop says that was true he needs to then ask, "how did you determine that person's identification of me was accurate?"
It's not at all a good argument. He was identified as the driver and none of that shit can change that.
Yea. At best, he could call this officer's visual identification of him into question.
If the cop on the stand didn't personally identify him as the driver, the cop's testimony is out. You can't admit testimony based on "well, some dude told me he was the guy."
That's not what was said you nigger. He identified the murderer, he just didn't know his name at the time of the incident.
It's like this nigger watched a tv show with a trial in it, and thought, THAT WILL BE MY ARGUMENT, "he di-int knows mahs name, air-go i iz inocent""
This nigger really is trying to put up sovereign citizen defense in a capital murder trial?
He’s too stupid to articulate it properly, or understand that this isn’t contract law.
That the judge is even allowing this just shows how far gone the whole system is.
That's what I've been thinking this whole time.
It's not necessarily a "sovereign citizen" argument, but it is true that when a fictional entity (the state) tries to being an action against you based on a "contract" that you never agreed to, if you know what your doing, you can get that shit tossed very easily.
But for this dumb nigger, it's not a fictional entity that he caused damages to. It was real people that he really killed. There are actual claimants that he can speak to (6th amendment) who can say " yes, nigger, I DO claim that you killed my family member. Here's the video evidence. Fucking hang."
This nigger will be the poster child for the old saying, "He who represents himself in court, has a fool for a client." Funny thing is that the nigger probably actually believes that it is the smartest one in the room...
When the nigger realizes the people in the room can see through his disguise, then the poo starts to fling and the nigger returns to his natural chimp-like state instead of continuing the exhausting process of pretending to be human.
And because he's so fuckin' stupid, the jury of dumbasses with a 4th grade education and an IQ of "Potato" are going to set him free.
It sounds like the guy wanted the officer to answer the question "who did you aim at" with "the guy talking to me right now".
No, he also has a problem with the officer using the word "you". He is trying to make the argument that the officer can't identify him because he didn't know his name at the time of the incident.
Dis be like yo my honor I'm on camera I drove through hundreds of people the ones I like aww didn't they be finr
Nigger attempts casualty argument by pretending he doesn't have a material form and only exists as a catalogue record.
(post is archived)