They actually claimed that SS was saving? Well they may have saved a bit when there were so few people over 65 vs many of working age.
They actually claimed that SS was saving? Well they may have saved a bit when there were so few people over 65 vs many of working age.
That was the whole spiel. "You're too short-sighted to save your money and invest wisely so it will blossom for your retirement, so we'll force you to let us do it for you." Meanwhile if current people paying it stopped, the recipients wouldn't get anything. It's totally the opposite of what they claimed it would be. Save now pay later became pay now save later.
That was the whole spiel. "You're too short-sighted to save your money and invest wisely so it will blossom for your retirement, so we'll force you to let us do it for you." Meanwhile if current people paying it stopped, the recipients wouldn't get anything. It's totally the opposite of what they claimed it would be. Save now pay later became pay now save later.
(post is archived)