![Oh no, lol [750x1171 - 491KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/g1rR3B.jpg){kind=link}
If you see a cripple and all you can think is that they should be left to die, then a piece of you is missing and your inability to empathize puts you in the same spiritual condition as the lowest jew or nigger.
Ever hear of eugenics? Yeah, those Nazis sure were a bunch of jews and niggers.
Either be a net positive on society or get out of society, we don’t need or want you, and I don’t care what your excuse is. Removing babies that would be nothing more than an eventual drain on society has been a practice of the most powerful civiliaztions in the history of the planet.
These are the things that build great societies. Produce. Innovate. Create a progeny of strength and dominance. And no, dominating other retards in the special olympics doesn’t count. If you can’t or won’t do any of these things, then you have no reason to enjoy the labors of the people who do.
Eugenics is not the same thing as leaving infants out to die. Past civilizations practiced exposure out of necessity, but civilization has reached a level of prosperity where we have the privilege of acting out of compassion. You are advocating that we practice it out of cruelty or some sort of imaginary quid pro quo situation. A lot of crippleds and retards hold down jobs.
Eugenics is not the same thing as leaving infants out to die.
I hope you’re not focusing on the hyperbole as your point of argument. I didn’t mean we have to make infants suffer, literally on the side of a hill; certainly it can be done more humanely these days. The point is about the sustainability of a civilization that’s made itself financially responsible for people who can’t or don’t contribute to the financial development of the same civilization. Actually literally the same as niggers. Do you support the idea of welfare for non-violent drug addict criminal niggers who do nothing to advance society? Legitimately, honestly, what’s the difference between the two? Neither benefits society, but neither has control over whether they benefit society or not. A nigger is born a nigger and a retard is born a retard.
You are advocating that we practice it out of cruelty
No, I’m advocating that we do what is best for society as a whole. Ancient Rome also reached a point where they were wealthy enough that they could support non-functional members of society out of compassion, so they stopped killing them as babies and started using society’s resources to support them.
Where’s the Roman Empire? Do you think they would’ve had as much trouble funding their defenses if they hadn’t depleted so much of their wealth on useless individuals?
Individuals either contribute to the growth of society, or they drain from society. There is nothing cruel about eliminating an individual that drains from everyone else for the sake of the well-being and sustainability of an entire culture
A lot of crippleds and retards hold down jobs.
Yeah, they hold subsidized jobs where a company is willing to have them do half the amount of work in the same amount of time as a person of below average intelligence while the rest of society pays the company back for their loss.
They may be able to function, but they aren’t productive, in any sense. And as such, there’s no reason they should be a part of a society that expects to thrive and grow
Listen buddy, could probably come up with a list of hundreds of things that are turning our society to complete shit. If those things are accomplished and our society is still complete shit I’ll entertain your argument to “humanely” murder some happy Downs kid whose biggest societal contribution is chasing butterflies for fun.
I don’t think we should leave them out on the curb. Maybe a teaspoon of Fentanyl and let them take themselves out after telling them what it is and does, if they are capable of understanding. If they aren’t capable, just give it to them. No need to suffer to death.
(post is archived)