>I don't see delayed and handicapped children as a burden So you’d have no problem paying for their lifelong care and living expenses yourself, yeah? Or are they only not a burden if everyone else pays for them? Or if corporations are willing to employ them at a [subsidized] loss so that their parents can have an afternoon off? Obviously there are a lot of things that our government wastes money on, and I’m not saying that the incapable are even a primary one, but they certainly are one, regardless. A handful of individuals that are a net negative on society don’t make much of an impact. Hundreds of thousands or even millions of net negatives make a large impact. I can’t believe I’m on a site like poal explaining this basic idea. Niggers are a net negative too, but they’re also impulsive and violent. They’re far in advance of retards in terms of societal drains, but that doesn’t mean that we should just accept other societal drains because they’re not *as bad.*