Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (8).
[–] • 0 pt
[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I know. I've heard them crying about old people when they worshipped that old nag for years. Now that their walking corpse is gone all of a sudden they say the SJC needs young blood.

Nevermind that Amy Coney Barrett and Kavanaugh are pretty damn young.

[–] • 0 pt

No no no the first 3 panels of it are fine. The issue is the last panel only. It's wrong. From his writings Thomas is fully well in agreement with infringement on guns. He doesn't say or use "Shall Not Be Infringed" in his ruling to lay the law down. He uses SCOTUS' first gun ruling (((Miller))) '39 to do so. And that wasn't actually a case. Miller died before SCOTUS heard the case. Miller's estate then didn't pay for a lawyer to send to SC to argue. It was a 1 sided noncase and should be struck from all legal authority.