No no no the first 3 panels of it are fine. The issue is the last panel only. It's wrong. From his writings Thomas is fully well in agreement with infringement on guns. He doesn't say or use "Shall Not Be Infringed" in his ruling to lay the law down. He uses SCOTUS' first gun ruling (((Miller))) '39 to do so. And that wasn't actually a case. Miller died before SCOTUS heard the case. Miller's estate then didn't pay for a lawyer to send to SC to argue. It was a 1 sided noncase and should be struck from all legal authority.
No no no the first 3 panels of it are fine. The issue is the last panel only. It's wrong.
From his writings Thomas is fully well in agreement with infringement on guns.
He doesn't say or use "Shall Not Be Infringed" in his ruling to lay the law down.
He uses SCOTUS' first gun ruling (((Miller))) '39 to do so. And that wasn't actually a case.
Miller died before SCOTUS heard the case. Miller's estate then didn't pay for a lawyer to send to SC to argue. It was a 1 sided noncase and should be struck from all legal authority.
(post is archived)