The Supreme Court has affirmed more than once that the 2nd amendment applies to individuals. His claim about privately owned weapons by marines is misleading, because it is about possession on a military base. The provost receipt is only for weapons that will be stored on the base. If law abiding citizens are disarmed, only criminals will have guns. Gun related crimes are highest in the most restrictive Democrat cities.
His claim about privately owned weapons by marines is misleading, because it is about possession on a military base. The provost receipt is only for weapons that will be stored on the base.
I was practically screaming at my screen when I heard this moron start yapping on this subject. It is pretty gay that professional warriors aren't allowed to keep their weapons where they'd like to on base, but this idiot is completely leaving out that if a Marine were to buy a weapon, say, an ARMALITE RIFLE OOOOOO SCARY, off-base and never intends to bring it on base... never has to get that provost receipt for that weapon.
He has to know this. This makes him seem disingenuous.
Telling misleading half truths to further a lie is bread and butter for Commies. They are trying to sell the "even the military doesn't trust soldiers with weapons" message because most veterans own guns and support the 2nd amendment. I am insulted that he says I am nothing more than a murder chimp when I have a gun in my hand.
Exactly. And even if THEY totally forbid selling weapon to civilians, criminals, lunatics still will find way to get one. Government can't ( or don't want ) to stop drugs and human trafficking how they will stop weapon trafficking? btw. even without firearms criminals and lunatics will still be dangerous. Just look on Britanistan. Although firearms are extremely rare, violent crimes are in rise. Knifes can kill too. Acid attack mostly aren't lethal but leave scares forever.
(post is archived)