Free Speech needs to end. Hear me out.
When it was written, it's intent was that you could express grievances about the government etc without repercussions. That's great, we'll keep that. But the Founding Fathers almost certainly did not mean for it to protect some of the absurd degeneracy, like pornography, that exists. The never would have dreamed that in 240 years, 10 year old boys with smart phones could watch 4k quality video of women getting pounded in the ass, spit on, pissed on, etc etc all while giant organizations defended it as Free Speech.
I guarantee you if they knew what society looks like today, they would have forbidden residency - let alone citizenship - to non-whites, banned Jews specifically just for special emphasis in case people forgot they're not white, banned Fractional Reserve Lending, banned degeneracy like pornography, banned women's "rights/liberation", banned Christianity, banned international corporations, and several dozen other things that are destroying White Civilization that they couldn't have forseen.
They intended men with strong morals would stamp out the degeneracy. Instead, the degenerates have used the Constitution as a shield.
When you have equal protection under the law you're no longer able to stamp out degeneracy as there is no legal recourse, the only solution to uphold morals is selective enforcement.
Why would they have banned Christianity? I'm just curious
I wrote a really comprehensive post about it in reply to another user a few months ago: https://poal.co/s/Videos/385276/1e055842-740f-4e14-9464-87c8495a43bd#cmnts
It's mostly on topic. The point is that Christianity IS Judaism for Goyim and as alien to our natural spirituality as Judaism or Islam.
i love your name. god damn im still laughing at it as i type
Cause christians suck jew cock cause "They are god's chosen people" not being able to wrap their feeble little minds around the fact that the first half of the bible, where jews are the chosen ones was written BY JEWS, Fuck organized religion.
The issue is if we start banning something then anything could be banned by applying that label.
Are you retarded? Do you know what a baseless, fallacious argument is? Are you implying that by banning, say, gangster rap, we risk banning, say, Mozart? Because someone might call Mozart "degenerate"?
You're either retarded or you're Jewish, my man.
I'm saying that any ban of media risks entirely different things being caught up in it as the only one who would can view the content is the state. There's nothing stopping a news article contrary to the narrative being labelled as pornography, nobody would be able to say differently so the charges could be applied to anything.
(post is archived)