![The Great Filter theory finally solved [1292x918 - 259KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/NvkH7D.png){kind=link}
Type 3 is impossible. Slightly answered with this. (((consumerism)) always ends well before T3 even is glanced at. I've seen theories describing this but I can't recall the name. But it's very interesting and makes perfect sense.
Even a type 2 would be post consumerism. At that point there is so much free or nearly free energy combined with interplanetary travel allowing for effectively limitless resources such that automation can fully satisfy all human desires.
But even that is a primitive understanding of consumerism where the perceived driving force behind it is the needs and wants of the masses. In reality consumerism is driven by the need to incentivize the masses to work. It is a means of control. In actuality consumerism dies when automation is sufficient to satisfy the needs of the elite. At that point the masses are culled. That point may be upon us already.
This is such a simple concept that hardly anyone is capable of comprehending. Most people fail to realize that the average person is worth nothing without their ability to do some type of labor or work. Take the need for labor away and the need for the average person also goes away.
It goes away the other way around, too. Take away work and the average person will waste away from depression and hedonia. Easy pleasures do not give long lasting satisfaction, and the average person lacks the capacity to seek out higher spiritual values for himself. If the upper class does not guide, or—as is the case with our civilization—activily misguides the masses, then they will favor donuts, television, sex and drugs over harder to achieve pleasures. Simply citing American obesity values is enough to support this argument.
I’d be interested in seeing any of these theories because assuming that consumerism is necessary as a species seems pretty easily flawed
Look up what the Kardashev Scale is. It's where T1 T2 and T3 civilization comes from. Humanity is still T1 so it's not unreasonable that we can't find a T3 which is itself weird.
e;
kek humanity isn't even T1 yet.
I’m aware of the kardashev scale, I’m just curious how you reached the conclusion that consumerism is necessary for any intelligent species, if consumerism is what prevents T3. I mean, we’re talking about the Fermi paradox, right? I took your comment to mean that we haven’t discovered a T3 civilization because T3 is impossible because of consumerism. And that just seems like a pretty baseless assumption
, blame taliban for us being type 0. kek.
(post is archived)