WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.1K
https://i0.wp.com/stonetoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/afghanistan-war-stonetoss-comic.png

(post is archived)

[–] 7 pts

The 2nd Amendment is only effective if we use it. We haven't used it in 160 years.

[–] 7 pts

Because we are comfortable. People are OK with living a hedonistic consumer driven life, but if you remove those comforts and distractions there will be anarchy and uprisings. We must remove the degenerate options in order to progress.

[–] 0 pt

look up battle of Athens but yeah I agree with your point

[–] 1 pt

That fixed Athens. We need one to fix 50.

Quit complaining and show us how it's done bro.

Washington lived in a time when men were men and they had weapons that were comparable to their enemy.

They’ve done a fairly good job of destroying gun culture. Fathers haven’t passed it down to their sons. Grown men don’t know how to hunt, don’t know how to shoot, and if the government decides to go to war with you, or the other way around, they will win very quickly.

They will carpet bomb the hell out of rural areas and suburbs and be done with it. Why wouldn’t they? They already control the cities, that’s plenty of the population, there will be enough people left for them to control. They know the dangerous people don’t live in the cities so they wipe out everything but the cities within two or three days and be done with it.

When you see one of those new fancy B-21’s coming your way what are you going to do, shoot it down with your hunting rifle?

They will not engage you on the ground. They won’t. They have no need to. If they do decide that they don’t want to toast the countryside, and they do this in a more traditional sense, half of your neighbors will rat you out and you know it. Maybe not you personally, but the people on your team. No, they’ve done a tremendous job of winning the war before a shot was even fired. The people would stand no chance. None.

You aren’t going up against muskets and rifles. Biden already threatened you with nukes.

[–] 5 pts

Yea that’s not how that would go down at all. They had trouble finding a bunch of shitskins in a hilly desert. The US is 15 times the size of Afghanistan and covered in forest and mountains to boot. It would be virtually impossible to find a fraction of rebels unless they are directly engaging government forces, and “carpet bombing the rural areas” would cut off all food supply to the cities and cause total Anarchy.

Basically you’re a fear mongering retard who has no idea what he’s talking about.

[+] [deleted] 0 pt
[–] [deleted] 4 pts

Yet they continue to change laws to confiscate guns or make it impossible to acquire guns. Why? Because the degenerate elite or politicians want to continue to walk among us, walk around their sprawling enclaves, travel the world, visit their fancy restaurants, concerts, I can go on and on. However they fear the average citizen with a gun. They fear that random bullet to the head for their crimes. The endgame is to takeaway our guns. They will always have a desire to be among us. See their loyal subjects. If you think the rich say to themselves, when shit hits fan, I'll just stay locked up in my multimillion dollar mansion within hundreds of acres, you're crazy. They want to travel around as they please. That is why they continue to push gun reform and the like. They don't want to live in fear.

[+] [deleted] 0 pt
[–] 0 pt

If I was in their position I think I would be perfectly content living my entire life in a luxury bunker while using cameras to watch the suffering of the masses. It's not the 18th century when the only way to see anything is to actually travel to the location.

[–] 1 pt

b-21s and the like require a lot of infrastructure, have a high cost per hour to operate. they aren't going to to bomb rural areas that contain all the infrastructure and are key to manning and logistics

[–] 1 pt

Yeah exactly. How are you going to fuel your tanks and planes when the entire infrastructure of the country shits itself?

What are you going to do if the B-21 co-pilot is a rebel, kills the pilot and then turns the bomber on some politicians house?

They’ve already done red team simulations of a revolution, the govt loses badly every time.

[–] 0 pt

the second the gov bombs its own citizens, russia and company will supply the resistance forces, feed intel and train. the optics alone would cause every anti us gov faction in the world to join in. lol. the gov doesnt want to rule over a wasteland infested with useless city rats.