WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.4K
https://i0.wp.com/stonetoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/afghanistan-war-stonetoss-comic.png

(post is archived)

[–] 12 pts

God damn it I was going to meme that. Been slackin on the meme front.

Kudos Stonetoss

I remember when reddit banned him, he came to Voat. However even though voat liked his work. He had a thin skin and left voat.... Boohoo

Still he is a great cartoonist.

[–] [deleted] 5 pts

His problem with Voat was that he wanted to take full control of /v/Stonetoss/ on his first day on Voat. Someone told him that it wasn't Reddit, so don't be like that Black Rifle Cofffee Company faggot, and that set him off so he spent the next two days having long-form tantrums and getting into it with the most vocal and contrarian voices on the site, which had just gone through that shit a year or two before with the Black Rifle Coffee fag, so they had zero patience for faggotry from Internet-famous niggerkikes.

[–] 2 pts

Why did Stonetoss leave voat? What did he say?

[–] 0 pt

he expected to be treated like royalty and threw a bitchfit when we hazed him like everybody else.

[–] 0 pt

Probably because Voat is a Qtard shithole.

[–] 1 pt

what? voat was downright hostile to gtards

[–] 1 pt

Fuck off, voat was freedom, I downvoated hundreds of retarded q-tard posts because they were obvious psyops. But I was allowed to do so.

[–] 0 pt

So many pussies. I don’t get it. There is nothing anyone can say to me to hurt my feelings.

[–] 1 pt

Oh yeah?

I am not interested in seeing a picture of your cock.

[–] 8 pts

Tanks and jets don't hold street corners, check papers, talk to people, gather intelligence, or confiscate contraband.

[–] 5 pts

Remember though, if the war gets hot, Biden isnt above using nukes and larger weapons against his own people. HOPEFULLY this lifts the fucking facade that the govt cares about t he liberals, but im pretty sure theyll think of themselves as martyrs instead whilst being lined up on the wall and shot

[–] 2 pts

No, they won't think of themselves as martyrs. They'll be too confused from the cognitive dissonance from trying to figure out how they are being included with the "enemy" and the beating they'll be taking as they try to explain they aren't like us liberty loving barbarians.

I’m not his biggest fan, but they will somehow find a way to blame Trump.

They will say that they were caught up in the confusion that he caused and that we shouldn’t blame the government for making a mistake that they are about to make because it was all his fault.

[–] 0 pt

Biden doesn’t push the button to launch the nukes, it’s some technician in the military and I’m willing to bet he won’t nuke his own country.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

every time some retard runs his mouth about nukes, remember how little damage that would do. (nuclearsecrecy.com)

nukes are only good against crowded population centers, and whites dont have a single one.

in order to wield nukes against us, theyd have to use at least five hundred tsar bombas, and that would get maybe half of us, and unify the rest against them, in which case theyd still be massively outnumbered(ignoring other countries taking advantage of the US wasting their arsensal against mostly empty land)

[–] 7 pts

The 2nd Amendment is only effective if we use it. We haven't used it in 160 years.

[–] 7 pts

Because we are comfortable. People are OK with living a hedonistic consumer driven life, but if you remove those comforts and distractions there will be anarchy and uprisings. We must remove the degenerate options in order to progress.

[–] 0 pt

look up battle of Athens but yeah I agree with your point

[–] 1 pt

That fixed Athens. We need one to fix 50.

Quit complaining and show us how it's done bro.

Washington lived in a time when men were men and they had weapons that were comparable to their enemy.

They’ve done a fairly good job of destroying gun culture. Fathers haven’t passed it down to their sons. Grown men don’t know how to hunt, don’t know how to shoot, and if the government decides to go to war with you, or the other way around, they will win very quickly.

They will carpet bomb the hell out of rural areas and suburbs and be done with it. Why wouldn’t they? They already control the cities, that’s plenty of the population, there will be enough people left for them to control. They know the dangerous people don’t live in the cities so they wipe out everything but the cities within two or three days and be done with it.

When you see one of those new fancy B-21’s coming your way what are you going to do, shoot it down with your hunting rifle?

They will not engage you on the ground. They won’t. They have no need to. If they do decide that they don’t want to toast the countryside, and they do this in a more traditional sense, half of your neighbors will rat you out and you know it. Maybe not you personally, but the people on your team. No, they’ve done a tremendous job of winning the war before a shot was even fired. The people would stand no chance. None.

You aren’t going up against muskets and rifles. Biden already threatened you with nukes.

[–] 5 pts

Yea that’s not how that would go down at all. They had trouble finding a bunch of shitskins in a hilly desert. The US is 15 times the size of Afghanistan and covered in forest and mountains to boot. It would be virtually impossible to find a fraction of rebels unless they are directly engaging government forces, and “carpet bombing the rural areas” would cut off all food supply to the cities and cause total Anarchy.

Basically you’re a fear mongering retard who has no idea what he’s talking about.

[+] [deleted] 0 pt
[–] [deleted] 4 pts

Yet they continue to change laws to confiscate guns or make it impossible to acquire guns. Why? Because the degenerate elite or politicians want to continue to walk among us, walk around their sprawling enclaves, travel the world, visit their fancy restaurants, concerts, I can go on and on. However they fear the average citizen with a gun. They fear that random bullet to the head for their crimes. The endgame is to takeaway our guns. They will always have a desire to be among us. See their loyal subjects. If you think the rich say to themselves, when shit hits fan, I'll just stay locked up in my multimillion dollar mansion within hundreds of acres, you're crazy. They want to travel around as they please. That is why they continue to push gun reform and the like. They don't want to live in fear.

[+] [deleted] 0 pt
[–] 0 pt

If I was in their position I think I would be perfectly content living my entire life in a luxury bunker while using cameras to watch the suffering of the masses. It's not the 18th century when the only way to see anything is to actually travel to the location.

[–] 1 pt

b-21s and the like require a lot of infrastructure, have a high cost per hour to operate. they aren't going to to bomb rural areas that contain all the infrastructure and are key to manning and logistics

[–] 1 pt

Yeah exactly. How are you going to fuel your tanks and planes when the entire infrastructure of the country shits itself?

What are you going to do if the B-21 co-pilot is a rebel, kills the pilot and then turns the bomber on some politicians house?

They’ve already done red team simulations of a revolution, the govt loses badly every time.

[–] 0 pt

the second the gov bombs its own citizens, russia and company will supply the resistance forces, feed intel and train. the optics alone would cause every anti us gov faction in the world to join in. lol. the gov doesnt want to rule over a wasteland infested with useless city rats.

[–] 5 pts

Afghanis are off the grid. They don't live in a society that encourages everyone to divulge personal information about themselves on the internet. There's no address the police can look up to pick you up and send you to the gulag. If you want to evade, get off the grid. That was literally all the Taliban did.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.

[–] 3 pts

The same way Washington beat the strongest military on the planet. Tenacity.

[–] 2 pts

also recognizing they are facing a bloated corrupt government full of pampered elites who are out of touch with the common people

[–] 0 pt

I wish yanks would stop this lie.

The royal navy was premier.

The royal army was miniscule in comparison.

And something something world power france

[+] [deleted] 1 pt
[–] 1 pt

Washington lost almost every battle he fought

[–] 0 pt

I believe that the best rebel generals were english

[–] 0 pt

yet they won the war. All that matters.

[–] 1 pt

Also only a colonial possession rather than the mainland.

[–] 0 pt

They had caves and shit. But I think we can make do.