WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

501

(post is archived)

I'm surmising that a cave with a midden that has only tools and trash you'd find in a hunting camp would probably be a hunting camp, you fucking retarded faggot. Everything after that is pretty much obvious, that a drawing of a naked lady in a hunting camp is probably not a religious artifact, you incredibly lightweight chucklehead.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Maybe bc after winter had cleared they went back outside and followed the game and easier to access water sources in the general area. Just the same as most other nomadic hunter-gatherer societies that move seasonally in the history of forever, but instead of seeking covered shelter like a 'useful fcking cave' for the winter months they only end up in their bc they were lost, separated from a larger hunting party and therefore couldn't make it back to their presumably outside community, ?/.Lmao - sorry faggot but you now sound fcking ridiculous. So yeah, the naked lady is 'probably' not a religious artifact despite the 'experts' claiming it is, yet everything else they claim is true ?/. Plus the idea that there would be anything other than 'tools and food craps' in a pre-historic/ early human midden is patently preposterous, you know like 'lady stuff' FFS, or like 'summer objects' again no, bc they moved back outside with all their stuff.

Did you have a stroke while you were typing that?

[–] 0 pt

Better than your 'Experts believe Early man would rather camp outside in hide tents during winter/ blizzards, days long snowfall, continual rain , below-freezing temperatures than move into the shelter of an existing cave for those cold dark months - and you can prove it - bc there's no lady stuff in the midden' . Wahahahaaa, what a total mong roflmao ....