WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 15 pts

Polaris does move in the sky, just not very much.

[–] 0 pt

Doesn't move so much as wobble.

They call that "precession."

[–] 2 pts

Wobbles are more fun though.

[–] 0 pt

It should be noticeable in a persons 70 year lifetime. Do the math.

[–] 3 pts

It moves even within the same night.

[–] -1 pt

B.S.

If it moved at all it would be useless for navigation. Yet it has been used by nearly all groups with great accuracy over thousands of years to explore the entire northern hemisphere.

Bullshit. I've never heard from any of the fake science bullshit that in 70 years you could see the move with the North Star.

heliocentrism is a disease of the Jew owned.

These fags believe in space and think Elon musk is sending stuff to a space station.

[–] 5 pts

I've done this myself FFS. My sides. and still you fucking abject retards cling to your (((belief))). . God damn you mongoloid well poisoning shabbos goys should be fucking gassed. You are an affront to millennia of White genius.

[–] 4 pts

You are right. They don't like to talk about it because it disproves their theory instantly.

Constellations by themselves WRECK heliocentrism since 2000 years ago all constellations were the same. Thinking about all the directions of motion at an aggregate million miles an hour along with all the stars and galaxies moving away during that time. Constellations should be unrecognizable every few hundred years. Nope. They are all the same for all recorded history. Except in the imaginations of scientistismists.

[–] 0 pt

It is with the right equipment. About 1 degree every 73 years

[–] 0 pt

So...I am asking seriously...how does this not present a serious problem for the heliocentric model? I am not trained in ANY space related science, but this seems like it would present navigational problems AND that is over 20° in 2000 years.