Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] • 15 pts

Polaris does move in the sky, just not very much.

[–] • 0 pt

Doesn't move so much as wobble.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

They call that "precession."

[–] • 2 pts

Wobbles are more fun though.

[–] • 0 pt

It should be noticeable in a persons 70 year lifetime. Do the math.

[–] • 3 pts

It moves even within the same night.

[–] • -1 pt

B.S.

If it moved at all it would be useless for navigation. Yet it has been used by nearly all groups with great accuracy over thousands of years to explore the entire northern hemisphere.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Bullshit. I've never heard from any of the fake science bullshit that in 70 years you could see the move with the North Star.

heliocentrism is a disease of the Jew owned.

These fags believe in space and think Elon musk is sending stuff to a space station.

[–] • 5 pts

I've done this myself FFS. My sides. and still you fucking abject retards cling to your (((belief))). . God damn you mongoloid well poisoning shabbos goys should be fucking gassed. You are an affront to millennia of White genius.

[–] • 4 pts

You are right. They don't like to talk about it because it disproves their theory instantly.

Constellations by themselves WRECK heliocentrism since 2000 years ago all constellations were the same. Thinking about all the directions of motion at an aggregate million miles an hour along with all the stars and galaxies moving away during that time. Constellations should be unrecognizable every few hundred years. Nope. They are all the same for all recorded history. Except in the imaginations of scientistismists.

[–] • 0 pt

It is with the right equipment. About 1 degree every 73 years

[–] • 0 pt

So...I am asking seriously...how does this not present a serious problem for the heliocentric model? I am not trained in ANY space related science, but this seems like it would present navigational problems AND that is over 20° in 2000 years.

[–] • 11 pts

434 light-years away and 4000 times brighter than our sun, which is 0.00002 light years away. Do you see a mountain move a few miles away as you walk around a flag pole at 10 ft? Does that disprove you are walking around the pole?

[–] • 0 pt

No it proves the mountain is just a hologram made by almighty God to confound the unbelievers! Just like the stars, the moon, the planets, comets and the international space station. I'm very smart for questioning if any of that exists despite being visible to even amateur astronomers.

[–] • 0 pt

Did I say anything about proving anything?

[–] • 0 pt

You said it doesn't disprove that you're walking around the pole, but it does. If you were really walking around the pole, the mountain would be flying around randomly because I don't understand the concept of scale. Checkmate globetard.

[–] • 6 pts

Not for nothing but we are told that the North Star changes every thousand or so years. The main Giza pyramid has a shaft pointing to the one that would have been the North Star back when it is thought to have been built.

I don't buy hook line and sinker everything NASA says, but our arguments should be well fleshed out.

[–] • 4 pts

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pole_star

There are supposedly 14 different stars that act as a north star over a 26,000-year cycle.

[–] • 3 pts

Every 30,000 years or so, you fucking mongoloid.

[–] • 1 pt

>I don't buy hook line and sinker everything NASA PhDNiggers-round-earth-propagandists say, but our arguments should be well fleshed out.

100% agree

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

This is how faggots and jews lie: They take one true fact, then tack a lie onto it, and behave as if that lie invalidates that fact, and therefore that entire concept is false. In this case, the truth is that there has bee a "North Star" for all "recorded Astronomy," but the author sort of left out the fact that all "recorded Astronomy" goes back about two and a half thousand years, and it gets really thin and sketchy before about 900 years ago. But then the author tacks on the lie that this is "impossible according to heliocentricity." This lie flies in the face of what we know about the Earth's Precession, and it also ignores the fact that 2,500 years is only a bit over 15 orbits of the planet Neptune around the Sun. He has no concept of astronomical scales or time scales.

I declare this meme to be Five out of Five Kikels in Prevarication.

[–] • 4 pts

This symbol is the keystone. That's why they had to vilify it so much that people would naturally slink away from it.

[–] • 3 pts

Wheel in the sky keeps on turning!

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt
[–] • 0 pt

When Steve Perry holds that one long note 😱

[–] • 3 pts

I like the windmill aesthetics. Maybe put it on a tshirt?

[–] • 0 pt

What about a flag or an armband?

[–] • 2 pts

i thought it does change? there's like 5 stars or something very close together that rotate and switch as the North Star. it definitely fascinated ancients though how some stars barely move whilst others move about heaps.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Sup aussie

[–] • 2 pts

Maps used to be oriented with Asia at the top (ie the orient) until they discovered a star that was far away and centered over solar systems rotation so we perceive it as non moving, that became a key part of oceanic navigation.

[–] • 2 pts

Fwiw, this is a video following very great astronomical observations .

It also suggests reason for the picture above.

Load more (4 replies)