WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

fakescience

fakescience

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

“I can indeed hardly see how anyone ought to wish Christianity to be true; for if so the plain language of the [New Testament] text seems to show that the men who do not believe, & this would include my Father, Brother & almost all my best friends, will be everlastingly punished. And this is a damnable doctrine.”

-Charles Darwin, autobiography

"[My] judgment often fluctuates…. Whether a man deserves to be called a theist depends on the definition of the term … In my most extreme fluctuations I have never been an atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God. — I think that generally (and more and more so as I grow older), but not always, — that an agnostic would be the most correct description of my state of mind."

-Charles Darwin, in correspondence with John Fordyce

At best, his early aims were to "help align scripture" the so-called science of his day, as if it needed his pompous ass for such assistance. What he instead did was draw faulty conclusions from observations made earlier and better - that being of a species improving and adding genetic information which results in change, rather than understanding the species loses genetic information as time continues and results in extinction setting end-marks of subsets within larger groups - as opposed to his mistaken assumption of the emergence of new subsets and groups.

Oh, so he was flirting with Deism, which is the religious belief of the preponderance of the USA's Founding Fathers? And in no way did Darwin ever so much as speculate about "adding genetic information," it was simply "Natural Selection." You can't "select" something that isn't already there.

And "improvement" is a very narrow way of looking at something that is simply "weighted towards the most fit." A long hooked beak might be good for sipping nectar, so that animal tends to eat nectar because it's more fit to do so than the short straight-beaked bird, which has an easier time opening nuts so that's what it eats.

Then you have a nut canker come through and most of your nut-cracking birds starve, but look, there was a nut-cracking rodent waiting in the wings, and when the canker is over and the nut trees return, that rodent will now be able to compete with the birds. That's how Natural Selection works, notice there is nothing in there about mutations.

Darwin knew nothing about nor did he ever conceive of mutations driving Natural Selection, which would be the required components of a basic Evolutionary Theory. He just discovered a pattern in Nature, which is a part of what Science is.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I love how he’s gone from a “Christian” to a deist/theist after I have the man in his own words confessing to agnosticism.

He didn’t even “discover” the patterns against which he drew his conclusions. He stood on the shoulders of over a century of concentrated thought on the subject, and even millennia of observations about natural selection and “survival of the fittest.”

Darwin was to original scientific thought and discovery as Milli Vanilli was to music.

[–] 1 pt

Milli Vanilli were epic and more exciting than Darwin.

Yeah Deists are kinda-sorta Christians too dude. His brother and father might have been atheists but he wasn't. You're getting your Dawkins all over everything else you fucking slop artist. Science isn't some oppositional force to Religion, only in stupid people. Right up until a few decades ago, most scientists of any note were also religious. Hawking had pretty much a whole chapter in his "Brief History of Time" book about how nothing he's ever heard of in Physics has ever contradicted common religious beliefs.

ALL scientists stand on the shoulders of other, often greater men. That's how the fucking thing works. This isn't a cartoon, and these guys aren't Rick Sanchez. Then faggots like you come along and piss all over the work of men far greater than yourself for the simple fact that whatever you don't understand must be fake and gay unless it conforms with your stripped-down faux-Contrarian (((world view))).

Know who else shits all over the works of the great European men of history? Kikes.