WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

fakescience

fakescience

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

Einstein stole real science from European scientists and Darwin was an observational scientist. Any other stupid questions?

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Derpwin was an agenda driven fraud and a hack whose “observations” were the equivalent of surmising that the leaves on trees create the wind. (((Einsteal))) was a fame whore whose stolen “discoveries” intentionally derailed science “research” and funding into the idiocy and funding boondoggle of “theoretical quantum mechanics” rather than practical, observable study.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

I bet you never even read anything real about Darwin, just political bullshit.

Darwin was a devout Christian man, who came up with a theory of Natural Selection. As far as I know he never mentioned anything about Evolution, just that Nature would favor the fitter of two species competing for the same biological niche. And Gregor Mendel was a monk who bred sweet peas and found that blossom colors followed certain heredity rules.

You and your world view are both fake and gay, you phony-baloney homosexual.

[–] 0 pt

Darwin was a mason.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

“I can indeed hardly see how anyone ought to wish Christianity to be true; for if so the plain language of the [New Testament] text seems to show that the men who do not believe, & this would include my Father, Brother & almost all my best friends, will be everlastingly punished. And this is a damnable doctrine.”

-Charles Darwin, autobiography

"[My] judgment often fluctuates…. Whether a man deserves to be called a theist depends on the definition of the term … In my most extreme fluctuations I have never been an atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God. — I think that generally (and more and more so as I grow older), but not always, — that an agnostic would be the most correct description of my state of mind."

-Charles Darwin, in correspondence with John Fordyce

At best, his early aims were to "help align scripture" the so-called science of his day, as if it needed his pompous ass for such assistance. What he instead did was draw faulty conclusions from observations made earlier and better - that being of a species improving and adding genetic information which results in change, rather than understanding the species loses genetic information as time continues and results in extinction setting end-marks of subsets within larger groups - as opposed to his mistaken assumption of the emergence of new subsets and groups.