WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

fakescience

fakescience

(post is archived)

Oh, so he was flirting with Deism, which is the religious belief of the preponderance of the USA's Founding Fathers? And in no way did Darwin ever so much as speculate about "adding genetic information," it was simply "Natural Selection." You can't "select" something that isn't already there.

And "improvement" is a very narrow way of looking at something that is simply "weighted towards the most fit." A long hooked beak might be good for sipping nectar, so that animal tends to eat nectar because it's more fit to do so than the short straight-beaked bird, which has an easier time opening nuts so that's what it eats.

Then you have a nut canker come through and most of your nut-cracking birds starve, but look, there was a nut-cracking rodent waiting in the wings, and when the canker is over and the nut trees return, that rodent will now be able to compete with the birds. That's how Natural Selection works, notice there is nothing in there about mutations.

Darwin knew nothing about nor did he ever conceive of mutations driving Natural Selection, which would be the required components of a basic Evolutionary Theory. He just discovered a pattern in Nature, which is a part of what Science is.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I love how he’s gone from a “Christian” to a deist/theist after I have the man in his own words confessing to agnosticism.

He didn’t even “discover” the patterns against which he drew his conclusions. He stood on the shoulders of over a century of concentrated thought on the subject, and even millennia of observations about natural selection and “survival of the fittest.”

Darwin was to original scientific thought and discovery as Milli Vanilli was to music.

[–] 1 pt

Milli Vanilli were epic and more exciting than Darwin.

Yeah Deists are kinda-sorta Christians too dude. His brother and father might have been atheists but he wasn't. You're getting your Dawkins all over everything else you fucking slop artist. Science isn't some oppositional force to Religion, only in stupid people. Right up until a few decades ago, most scientists of any note were also religious. Hawking had pretty much a whole chapter in his "Brief History of Time" book about how nothing he's ever heard of in Physics has ever contradicted common religious beliefs.

ALL scientists stand on the shoulders of other, often greater men. That's how the fucking thing works. This isn't a cartoon, and these guys aren't Rick Sanchez. Then faggots like you come along and piss all over the work of men far greater than yourself for the simple fact that whatever you don't understand must be fake and gay unless it conforms with your stripped-down faux-Contrarian (((world view))).

Know who else shits all over the works of the great European men of history? Kikes.

[–] 0 pt

You know who aren’t “kinda sorta Christians,” jew? Fucking agnostics like Darwin.

Darwin, Hawking, Einstein, and all of the rest of these fuckers who are celebrated today: you know their names because they’re bullshit artists propped up by the jew media to help drive their atheist and humanist bullshit lines. They’re all fucking trash, and all of their “discoveries” are either forgeries, thefts, or completely unprovable, and will be wholly dismantled eventually.