WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

168

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

Then there is the Free Enterprise system practiced by the Founding Fathers

Also, known as capitalism. :)

Don't blame our failed monetary policy and our socialized tax system on capitalism.

Fascism is one alternative. National Socialism is another.

Our current system is pretty crap, but less freedom (which is what we get with fascism and natsoc, IMHO) is never the answer.

[–] 1 pt

Allowing people to do what they wanted let them get comfortable and easily subverted by outside powers. Free enterprise just means that dishonest people can metagame.

The first ruler in a fascist country may be fine, it would be those who follow that would fuck it all up. So then what the people revolt and start over? Is this nothing better than feudalism?

[–] 0 pt

What's necessarily wrong with feudalism? An established monarchy that is comprised of the people is the long term goal because it allows for succession.

As long as you make a barrier to entry to power it should at the very least remove a large number of fools. I hear your argument countless times and it doesn't make logical sense. Fascism isn't the worship of one person.

Also, known as capitalism.

"Capitalism" came from --- Karl Marx.

"Free market economy" didn't.