![Found on the moon [750x500 - 95KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/WvwGkH.jpg){kind=link}
it is so weird and creepy the fucking morons who still believe we went 240 thousand miles to the moon and back with 1969 technology 6 times in 6 years in a God damn tin can with battery technology that is terrible compared to today and somehow it is basically impossible to go back now even though computer power and other materials technology is so fucking far advanced it should be 1000 times easier!
Do you want to come clean and revise this or will we walk away admitting you're full of shit? Perhaps you really don't know why that's full of shit? If so, it's shameful you have any position.
Point out which of my claims are ridiculous.. when you get down to it everything was fucking ridiculous about the God damn moon landing hoax! Admitted they were making a film just in case it failed if you didn't know.
Already did. Confirms you're either an idiot or a liar.
Look, I'm open to either position here but all you're doing is talking shit and attacking the poster.
So, Mr. Science, use your deep well of knowledge to address the points raised.
For example, the no stars from the moon photographs is addressed in the documentary - it's not a valid criticism. What is valid about the film material itself is that there is no possible way it could be used in -250 degree temperatures. It would shatter when cycled. Also true is that the commercial camera they used would be incapable of operation in that temperature range due to the effect of temperature on the mechanical internals. Also of interest is the lack of radiation artifacts of the film itself which should be present and was present on early unmanned photographs.
It's really not all so easily dismissed and that is why I'm interested in understanding why some of the questions raised have no apparent counters. I don't want to be in doubt whether we landed on the moon, but I am. You can keep being an ass, or you can offer source that can help address these issues.
All that is readily debunked. It's bullshit. Don't waste our time.
How about revising basic statements as asked so that they are not complete lies? You can't completely lie and expect to be treated as a peer. And it's completely dishonest to expect any other position.
K, so more shit talking.
Bye.
Go look some ASTRONAUTS say thry could see stars some say they couldn't at least get your fucking stories strait
If you haven't seen the documentary, you should take a look. They addressed the lack of stars in photographs and its valid given the photographic equipment they would have been using. That said, the actual photographic film and camera they used was off the shelf gear and could not have survived that environment.
Ignore the guy who can't be bothered to post content and sounds like a greatest hits collection of leftist zingers; debunked! revise! Come clean! Lies!
I certainly don't claim have the answers, but aside from ad hominem attacks, that guy has none. I'd really like to find content that disputes the points in the doc I posted though - I know you're totally in the landings are bullshit camp, and after that doc... I don't know. If you come across any response vids, or even unrelated content the refutes the points made on the doc I posted, please let me know.
I'd appreciate it!
(post is archived)