![Found on the moon [750x500 - 95KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/WvwGkH.jpg){kind=link}
That cat didn't ride the rocket. It got there on its cat-apult.
That cat didn't ride the rocket. It got there on its cat-apult.
The cat will have a big decision to make about where it is going to shit.
The cat will have a big decision to make about where it is going to shit.
The whole moon is covered with regolith, so basically the moon is one big litter box.
The whole moon is covered with regolith, so basically the moon is one big litter box.
Hence the difficulty the cat will have in choosing a spot: too many choices. It would be like a cat in a room full of blazer pointers..which one to chase?
Hence the difficulty the cat will have in choosing a spot: too many choices. It would be like a cat in a room full of blazer pointers..which one to chase?
huge number of fake moon landing reptilians aliens etc shill posts appearing lately
thinking
huge number of fake moon landing reptilians aliens etc shill posts appearing lately
*thinking*
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpuKu3F0BvY&t=38s
One of the more authoritative docs on the topic. If there is a rebuttal, please let me know.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpuKu3F0BvY&t=38s
One of the more authoritative docs on the topic. If there is a rebuttal, please let me know.
One way to spot intellectual dishonesty is to see who they're pitting their arguments against, whoever that random italian is more than likely not from NASA, it's strawmanning. The lander never encounters atmosphere, the way it looks is irrelevant. The landing sites were always a heritage site, too bad, it's not like people would believe it unless they drove right over the footprints. Who said the rover (edit: rover driving) footage is live? Dust only sticks with moisture? In what world do vibrations do not dissipate with distance?
You wasted 3+ hours of your life on this?
One way to spot intellectual dishonesty is to see who they're pitting their arguments against, whoever that random italian is more than likely not from NASA, it's strawmanning. The lander never encounters atmosphere, the way it looks is irrelevant. The landing sites were always a heritage site, too bad, it's not like people would believe it unless they drove right over the footprints. Who said the rover (edit: **rover driving**) footage is live? Dust only sticks with moisture? In what world do vibrations do not dissipate with distance?
You wasted 3+ hours of your life on this?
The content of the documentary was compelling and if you're not willing to watch it, so be it, but you're hardly in a position to say anything about it.
Why open with a counter? A straw man argument is making the value of the content about the fact that the person is Italian and not about whether the series of points the Italian raised make a valid argument based on sound reasoning. I don't view considering opposing arguments a waste of time, I consider engaging with people who talk shit without considering the subject matter on it's own terms a waste of time.
I don't even know what I think on the topic, the doc raises some questions that are hard to get around. I simply asked if there are solid rebuttals to the inconsistencies raised in the video.
The content of the documentary was compelling and if you're not willing to watch it, so be it, but you're hardly in a position to say anything about it.
Why open with a counter? A straw man argument is making the value of the content about the fact that the person is Italian and not about whether the series of points the Italian raised make a valid argument based on sound reasoning. I don't view considering opposing arguments a waste of time, I consider engaging with people who talk shit without considering the subject matter on it's own terms a waste of time.
I don't even know what I think on the topic, the doc raises some questions that are hard to get around. I simply asked if there are solid rebuttals to the inconsistencies raised in the video.
I've watched that before. So much bullshit combined with half truths and purposeful misrepresentation.
It's safe to say you are knowingly peddling bullshit or lack any knowledge of fundamental science.
For example, the VA belt calls out A14, but ignores the recorded radiation is an order of magnitude higher than the other missions. Right there in what they show. Which well invalidates the talking point. Opps. Then proceeds to take the next guy's statements completely out of context to bolster a lie built upon the fact the just finished ignoring and misrepresenting.
These videos are trivial to tear apart. I encourage you to learn more about basic science.
As it relates to radiation, learn about the non-linear model and why Van Allen wouldn't have known and why even that is known to be invalid. Then place it back into context here.
A little knowledge and science completely destroys these "documentaries."
I've watched that before. So much bullshit combined with half truths and purposeful misrepresentation.
It's safe to say you are knowingly peddling bullshit or lack any knowledge of fundamental science.
For example, the VA belt calls out A14, but ignores the recorded radiation is an order of magnitude higher than the other missions. Right there in what they show. Which well invalidates the talking point. Opps. Then proceeds to take the next guy's statements completely out of context to bolster a lie built upon the fact the just finished ignoring and misrepresenting.
These videos are trivial to tear apart. I encourage you to learn more about basic science.
As it relates to radiation, learn about the non-linear model and why Van Allen wouldn't have known and why even that is known to be invalid. Then place it back into context here.
A little knowledge and science completely destroys these "documentaries."
I thought the "fake moon landing" people were crackpots until I watched this. Now I have real doubts about the whole thing. Especially near the end where the astronauts look like they want to crawl under the table to avoid answering questions.
I thought the "fake moon landing" people were crackpots until I watched this. Now I have real doubts about the whole thing. Especially near the end where the astronauts look like they want to crawl under the table to avoid answering questions.
Having watched this I'm 100% sure "fake moon landings" is only supported by nut jobs and shills.
Having watched this I'm 100% sure "fake moon landings" is only supported by nut jobs and shills.
Those old movies are fun to watch. At least by then they knew the moon wasn't made out of cheese. Lol
Those old movies are fun to watch. At least by then they knew the moon wasn't made out of cheese. Lol
I mean, that's the opening scene. There's a whole documentary on the moon landing after that.
I always laughed at those who questioned the moon landing; I'm not sure anymore.
I mean, that's the opening scene. There's a whole documentary on the moon landing after that.
I always laughed at those who questioned the moon landing; I'm not sure anymore.
Regolith in your pussy is way worse than sand.
Regolith in your pussy is way worse than sand.
The cat looks Russian.
The cat looks Russian.
Yea, cats on the moon, it's a fact.
Yea, cats on the moon, it's a fact.
so area 51 has a cat
so area 51 has a cat
it is just as believable to see a cat walking around on the moon ..than to believe that a man was there in 69 when they couldnt even make a decent TV or appliance back then
it is just as believable to see a cat walking around on the moon ..than to believe that a man was there in 69 when they couldnt even make a decent TV or appliance back then
Now hold on there! I owned an appliance repair business for a decade and I can attest to how solid the appliances were in the 1960's and 1970's. The newer ones are all computerized junk and Samsung is by far the worst brand. Back then, they were machines, real machines, built by companies familiar with building solid, heavy gauge steel devices.
At my house, I had 1970 Maytags for 15 years that never failed, then gifted them to my poor neighbors who were still using them a decade later.
Now hold on there! I owned an appliance repair business for a decade and I can attest to how solid the appliances were in the 1960's and 1970's. The newer ones are all computerized junk and Samsung is by far the worst brand. Back then, they were machines, real machines, built by companies familiar with building solid, heavy gauge steel devices.
At my house, I had 1970 Maytags for 15 years that never failed, then gifted them to my poor neighbors who were still using them a decade later.
The best thing about the moon landing hoax is the
AGENT SMITH EFFECT
it is so weird and creepy the fucking morons who still believe we went 240 thousand miles to the moon and back with 1969 technology 6 times in 6 years in a God damn tin can with battery technology that is terrible compared to today and somehow it is basically impossible to go back now even though computer power and other materials technology is so fucking far advanced it should be 1000 times easier!
Anyways the thing that is funny or creepy is the agent smit effect. Like agent Smith from the matrix. When you try to convince people the moon landing was fake they transform into an agent Smith and must defend their reality at all cost! It is creepy. I watched a video made by nasa and the scientist said we would need 5 feet of lead shielding to go through the van allen belts! I literaly can't find the video any longer but I watched it. Guess he forgot we already went through 6 times in 6 years in a tin can!
Anyways at this point if you believe we went to the moon you are a fucking idiot you probably think Isreal is our greatest ally
The best thing about the moon landing hoax is the
AGENT SMITH EFFECT
it is so weird and creepy the fucking morons who still believe we went 240 thousand miles to the moon and back with 1969 technology 6 times in 6 years in a God damn tin can with battery technology that is terrible compared to today and somehow it is basically impossible to go back now even though computer power and other materials technology is so fucking far advanced it should be 1000 times easier!
Anyways the thing that is funny or creepy is the agent smit effect. Like agent Smith from the matrix. When you try to convince people the moon landing was fake they transform into an agent Smith and must defend their reality at all cost! It is creepy. I watched a video made by nasa and the scientist said we would need 5 feet of lead shielding to go through the van allen belts! I literaly can't find the video any longer but I watched it. Guess he forgot we already went through 6 times in 6 years in a tin can!
Anyways at this point if you believe we went to the moon you are a fucking idiot you probably think Isreal is our greatest ally
If your position is so strong, why do you make fake claims to establish it?
If your position is so strong, why do you make fake claims to establish it?
Which false claims agent smith.. here is my 10 reasons it's bullshit there are probably 1109 reasons or more.
Sure keep believeing that fucking fairy tale.. we went to the moon with less computing power then a fucking walmart wrist watch.
Also the moonlanding story is fucking hillarious.
Every ounce of weight mattered on the original moooon landings. Yet they took a fucking dunemoonbuggy and a golf club!! Lol
They did a live broadcast with a phone call to the president on live tv with almost no delay perfect worked perfect
They went through the van allen radiation belts in a tin and aluminum hull! Lol and 3 different nasa astrounaghts recently said we dont have the technology to get through the van allen belts now one said we would need 5 foot thick lead shield.
Not one picture from the moon or the flight that shows stars for some reason.
The greatesr human achievment and nasa recorded over the telemtry data! Sure right good one lol.
Almost no clear goos pictures of the earth from the moon and not one picture of an astronaught with the earth in the back ground
One timeline with modern technology said 20 years to get to the moon in 1969 they did it faster i guess they had really good tech back then! Lol
The rock buzz aldrin gave to a museum in holland was petrified wood. Lol!
In the interview after they got back one astrobaught said i dont remember seeing any stars! Lol go out and lokk at the sky u will see stars now imagine being on the moon with no atmospher and saying you couldnt see stars
They fucking way they talk during their time on the moon sounds more like guys going to the beach not guys 290,000 miles from earth in the vacum of space where any tiny mistep is certain death. Go back and listen and realise there is no fucking way they should be that gib and relaxed.
Im sure there is more but those 10 things should at least make you raise your eyebrows and think maybe something is not right
Which false claims agent smith.. here is my 10 reasons it's bullshit there are probably 1109 reasons or more.
Sure keep believeing that fucking fairy tale.. we went to the moon with less computing power then a fucking walmart wrist watch.
Also the moonlanding story is fucking hillarious.
Every ounce of weight mattered on the original moooon landings. Yet they took a fucking dunemoonbuggy and a golf club!! Lol
They did a live broadcast with a phone call to the president on live tv with almost no delay perfect worked perfect
They went through the van allen radiation belts in a tin and aluminum hull! Lol and 3 different nasa astrounaghts recently said we dont have the technology to get through the van allen belts now one said we would need 5 foot thick lead shield.
Not one picture from the moon or the flight that shows stars for some reason.
The greatesr human achievment and nasa recorded over the telemtry data! Sure right good one lol.
Almost no clear goos pictures of the earth from the moon and not one picture of an astronaught with the earth in the back ground
One timeline with modern technology said 20 years to get to the moon in 1969 they did it faster i guess they had really good tech back then! Lol
The rock buzz aldrin gave to a museum in holland was petrified wood. Lol!
In the interview after they got back one astrobaught said i dont remember seeing any stars! Lol go out and lokk at the sky u will see stars now imagine being on the moon with no atmospher and saying you couldnt see stars
They fucking way they talk during their time on the moon sounds more like guys going to the beach not guys 290,000 miles from earth in the vacum of space where any tiny mistep is certain death. Go back and listen and realise there is no fucking way they should be that gib and relaxed.
Im sure there is more but those 10 things should at least make you raise your eyebrows and think maybe something is not right
it is so weird and creepy the fucking morons who still believe we went 240 thousand miles to the moon and back with 1969 technology 6 times in 6 years in a God damn tin can with battery technology that is terrible compared to today and somehow it is basically impossible to go back now even though computer power and other materials technology is so fucking far advanced it should be 1000 times easier!
Do you want to come clean and revise this or will we walk away admitting you're full of shit? Perhaps you really don't know why that's full of shit? If so, it's shameful you have any position.
> it is so weird and creepy the fucking morons who still believe we went 240 thousand miles to the moon and back with 1969 technology 6 times in 6 years in a God damn tin can with battery technology that is terrible compared to today and somehow it is basically impossible to go back now even though computer power and other materials technology is so fucking far advanced it should be 1000 times easier!
Do you want to come clean and revise this or will we walk away admitting you're full of shit? Perhaps you really don't know why that's full of shit? If so, it's shameful you have any position.
Hahaha! The moon is a light, or plasma. You can't land on a light!!
Hahaha! The moon is a light, or plasma. You can't land on a light!!
(post is archived)