WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

442

Short but funny. Stolen from Voat.

Short but funny. Stolen from Voat.

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

It was such a dumb post I have to assume it's a shill/troll account.

"Fellow whites! We need to make room at work for the greater intellectual capacities of our white women! It's time for us to step aside!"

Usual black pill BS.

[–] 1 pt

Did I say greater? Women have a lot to offer society in a great many ways. Their impact in biology and medicine in the past few decades is clear evidence of this. Deciding women should exclusively serve in the roles they did in the mid 20th century merely displays an ignorance of history and reality on your part.

[+] [deleted] 0 pt

Doubling the workforce and halving purchasing power isn't offering society anything of value. Until there is housing segregated by one or two working parents and race, women or Hispanics working is not good for White families.

[–] 1 pt

That’s a completely different argument though. The real contributors to excess labour in the past half century has been the opening up of India and China. That’s a workforce of over a billion added, and all cheap labour.

However, the “doubling” locally of the workforce is a huge problem, you’re right (I won’t delete the above paragraph cos that was my first reaction to your point). Women are now forced to work in the west even when they have kids cos of the effect of some women working when they have kids. It’s the prisoners dilemma basically - to have a decent house now you both have to have decent jobs. I think this question is the most important question we have to answer in our age. We shouldn’t forbid women from working, we shouldn’t force to women to work, but how do we do neither?

Hispanics or any manner of immigrant can fuck off till they’re told they’re welcome. That’s not a hard question, just a (((wrong answer)))

[–] 0 pt

It's like watching a White teacher trying to reason with niglets. I admire your patience.

It's honestly the most outrageous statement I've read since I'm here. It started so well too with the "normalisation of the abnormal" part, he had me in the first half not gonna lie.

[–] 1 pt

Radiation and DNA were discovered thanks to particular women’s intellectual capabilities. What precisely have your male intellectual capabilities contributed to the advancement of human knowledge and understanding?

[–] 2 pts (edited )

How much was Marie and how much was Pierre? They were a team and yet he's treated like a footnote and she's paraded around in the typical diversity hire fashion and you certainly don't hear a damn thing about Henri Becquerel.

I remember in 3rd grade we had to do a paper on a 'great female leader' or some shit from a list. I went with Earhart just because I thought it was so ironic, I made sure to mention that a man had already made it around the world before she even set off and that she crashed and burned and never made it but that it was such a big accomplishment worth remembering to this day because vagina.