That’s a completely different argument though. The real contributors to excess labour in the past half century has been the opening up of India and China. That’s a workforce of over a billion added, and all cheap labour.
However, the “doubling” locally of the workforce is a huge problem, you’re right (I won’t delete the above paragraph cos that was my first reaction to your point). Women are now forced to work in the west even when they have kids cos of the effect of some women working when they have kids. It’s the prisoners dilemma basically - to have a decent house now you both have to have decent jobs. I think this question is the most important question we have to answer in our age. We shouldn’t forbid women from working, we shouldn’t force to women to work, but how do we do neither?
Hispanics or any manner of immigrant can fuck off till they’re told they’re welcome. That’s not a hard question, just a (((wrong answer)))
>We shouldn’t forbid women from working, we shouldn’t force to women to work, but how do we do neither?
The answer was in my post. Consequences.
If housing and other big purchases is separated by whether married men or men and women can earn income, expect more families without women working because the need for the big incomes comes from needing to live away from subhumans. Let single mothers and dual earners rat race among themselves as they see fit in exchange for their "modern freedom."
That’s still forbidding people from doing things though. People should be free to do as they choose, and they’ll generally do what they choose anyway. In your model people will just have families but not get married, earn two incomes, and have the big house. Forcing people to do things doesn’t really work. (I’m a living example of this, my country has stayed in strict lockdown cos of rona, so now I’m living on an island in tropics for the next few months till they cop on 😊)
I'm definitely not doubting how bad government is at enforcing household law. It's quite terrible.
My whole point wasn't very clear. If women must work, I'd argue that they should only be able to do so after marriage, and that signing up for a job with her SSN puts her family in the "dual income" category, out of competition with families where only men work. Women have time to find a husband during education. Some women might work under the table, but they are risk-averse enough to deter this, it seems.
Of course, the ideal is women not working but instead helping and being helped by the other White mothers and grandmothers raising children in a multi-generational household passing down the family's unique and timeless heritage, traditions, stigmas, and customs. This after their fathers arrange their marriages as virgins to good men.
(post is archived)