![Lolbertarians [GIF - 522KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/jAkqSx.gif){kind=link}
Pretty much all the "libertarians" I've ever met who value those things are "left libertarian" entryists whose commitment to liberty begins with degeneracy and ends with free gibs from the government.
Actual libertarians tend to be not so keen. With the possible exception of weed.
Actual libertarians tend to be not so keen. With the possible exception of weed.
And a total lack of borders + demographic management. Which is to say that every actual libertarian is like a civnat but worse.
And a total lack of borders + demographic management.
*borders and demographics controlled by property owners and their communities rather than commie jews and central bankers.
Borders are an inseparable part of private property, which along with self ownership is the cornerstone of libertarianism.
The Commies and central bankers have just made a claim to all of the property. Who are you to argue with that? Seems like you've got no choice but to defend your own claims to your ownership. What do you do?
Borders are an inseparable part of private property
So then the cheap-labor loving fags who run ranches and farms along the border in Texas can, in a libertarian order, opt to allow illegals to come right in?
Is it OK by libertarianism that these property owners have stymied for decades the construction of a border wall? What about those useful idiot indians who didn't want their Great Orange Father to build a wall through "their" land?
(post is archived)