You guys are not saying the same thing. In the case of homophobia, you’re saying the fear is rational, he’s saying that the fear doesn’t exist
I think we're essentially saying the same thing in different ways. Im thinking a phobia needs to be rooted in the irrational. However, he's saying that the phobia isnt a phobia because it isnt natural. Same thing, different premise
No, he’s saying the phobia isn’t a phobia because he isn’t afraid, you’re saying it isn’t a phobia because it’s natural, or rational, to be afraid; as in being afraid of spiders. You’re saying it’s rational to be afraid of spiders so it’s not a phobia because phobias are irrational fears, correct?
Right, i think i confused myself. My bad
(post is archived)