WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

907

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 3 pts
[–] 0 pt

The Verdict ... Higher poverty rates among various urban black communities might explain the difference in crime rates, although the evidence is mixed.

Crikey!, that's a lot of squirming for one sentence. Not sure it would be possible to mix evidence so much that it turns to the opposite of what it was. Poverty rates don't matter, relative poverty rates (gini coeficient) has some effect, but poor whites still commit less crime than rich blacks.

[–] 1 pt

Well you can't expect them to admit that variations in the MAOA gene between different racial groups has a bigger effect on violent crime rates between different racial groups than poverty, can you?

[–] 0 pt

Why does it make sense to me that the UK would be more honest about this (as they are in this article) than the U.S. would? Maybe because they tend to be more blunt, straightforward people? So they are definitely left, but not quite as "pretend that reality is not real", left as the US is? I just don't see an article like this being published in a U.S. news outlet.

[–] 1 pt

Eh, if they start being honest about blacks in the UK committing more crimes, I'll be impressed. Remember, that the only reason we even know this crap is that the SJWs insist on collating statistics by race so they can go on about how oppressed they all are. It's not like they haven't thought this through.

[–] 0 pt

And this highlights the problem with OP's image (which was posted in funny so who cares but it's good to know). Blacks committed over half of all murders but less than half of all violent crimes, though they're still 2-5x as likely to commit every other category of violent crime as whites.

[–] 0 pt

I was hoping for a link to see the fact check confirm itself as pictured.

These articles are good too though.

Yeah, I looked, but couldn't find the exact one.