WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

230

(post is archived)

[–] 12 pts

Thats the reason. 20 years ago we were actively removing racism, sexism, and sequel orientation as a conflict. We were judging each other on our actions and ambitions. And it was good. The world was changing and getting better.

And that was a problem for the ruling elite. If we come together as a people we make the rules. If we fight each other over stupid shit and volunteer to be boxed into special little identity spheres we lose our ability to negotiate and dictate with the powers that be.

Why do you think identity politics was suddenly and forcefully pushed so hard from the mid 2000s? Because it takes time to grow.

Hating someone because of uncontrollable things is the same stupid idiocy as giving them a pass for it. Judge people on their actions and abilities, otherwise you are playing into the ruling elites hands.

[–] 10 pts

You can’t remove racism nor sexism because genders and races are fundamentally different and unequal

[–] 5 pts

Yes, you can, because It's not about equality. It's about ability and ambition.

Sex and race and genetics set your range. You have several stats that, based on those things, will never be below or above a certain threshold, But what you do inside of those changes everything. Brilliant ambitious people have lazy stupid children all the time. Their genetics bar was high but they never did anything with it. In the same way someone with disadvantages can work hard to maximize their abilities and become their peak self.

Will that mean there will always be stronger or smarter men or white or dumber or weaker women or blacks sure maybe, but judge people based on what they can and will do, not on some arbitrary thing that you just blanket across everyone. Just because you are white doesn't make you good. Just because you're black doesn't make you bad. Just because you're a woman doesn't make you weak.

Our society drives those things. Allow people to become the best them they can and judge them accordingly.

[–] 9 pts

You can keep trying to pretend race is not tied to genetics and or that genetics are not tied to societal capacity and cohesion. But you will keep being wrong.

[–] 5 pts (edited )

Intelligence is the greatest determinant of ones abilities in life. Not parents or society. Also there is such a thing as a mean iq.

And yes whites tend to make better more altruistic societies than Black. You judge by the mean, not the outliers

If someone has an iq or 85 they will never be capable of the same things as a person with an iq of 120. Factually.

Here’s a great list that goes over things : https://archive.is/LRe05

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

We can't set standards based on outliers. We have norms and based on those, fuck all niggers and jews.

[–] 0 pt

Which is why it can serve as an eternal excuse.

[–] 2 pts

Racism and sexism are good. People are unequal and biology doesnt care if people are ‘created’ differently. What matters is logic

[–] 3 pts

The same reason NY was sabotaged in the early 80's. After surviving the summer blackout and widespread looting in 1977, the city's neighborhoods began to come together.
The resulting movement was hip-hop, an explicitly unifying culture based on freedom, respect and the common struggle of the underclass. When the #1 rap group became Blondie, a white disco band, it was time to Shut It Down.
First Brooklyn was seeded with crack, then the resulting paranoia and poverty was exoloited by the recording industry to create "gansta rap", angry and divisive music that was heavily promoted.
By the time the scene recovered in the early 1990's it was quickly co-opted again by infusing it with Islamic seperatism.

[–] 3 pts

Thats the reason. 20 years ago we were actively removing racism, sexism, and sequel orientation as a conflict.

No we weren't. We were institutionalising anti-white racism as the dominant ideology.

And it was good. The world was changing and getting better.

It was? Doesn't look better to me.

[–] 1 pt

Nope, it wasn't good. It was part of the selling out & invasion of the West that's been going on since ~1965. You're completely ignorant if you don't think non-whites have always had and retained their identity politics... They were happy to play along because it meant that they would eventually inherit the West; now that they have large numbers and White hegemony is over, they are free to be more aggressive and honest about their intentions. But they've been laughing at us behind closed doors all along, for being stupid enough to surrender our homelands and the legacy of our ancestors to foreigners.

Hate in this context is simply an in-group preserving immune response. I know it's not pretty or rational, but in evolutionary terms hating the 'other' is necessary sometimes to protect the genetic cluster. The ruling elite does not want Whites to rediscover ethnocentrism, and that should be more than obvious. They are not yet ready to run the West without Whites... Not yet.

You're either a young fool or a liar. Hopefully just a fool. We were never going to "come together", and if by some miracle all the elites were gone tomorrow, we would still be left with large populations of non-whites who want the West for themselves (and always have).

[–] 1 pt

Found the faggot nigger

[–] 0 pt

Put the mirror down sonny

[–] 0 pt

I'm a nigger faggot, ya filthy boomer!