WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

394

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Do you know what the UN's security council is? Can you name the players sitting around that table? At least?

...

There's a world of a difference between "sanctions", and a full blown military invasion

The difference seems to escape you for ideological reason, unfortunately

[–] 0 pt

the sanctions helped the war in iraq by weakening iraq.. obviously the united nations was ok with helping to topple israel's enemies

https://news.cornell.edu/stories/1999/09/former-un-official-says-sanctions-against-iraq-amount-genocide

you have to look at actions, not words

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Iraq was a regional power which was at war with iran at some point, a lot of middle eastern powers had an interest in reducing iraq's influence in the region, but not to the point of engaging in a full blown military confrontation with it

France opposed the military invasion of iraq, a lot of country did and paid a high price for that, all members of the UN btw

I'm telling you, facts go against your narrative once again

The UN never supported the military invasion of iraq, there's no debate to have about that, it's a fact.

And saddam hussein wasn't exactly an angel btw https://pic8.co/sh/TamPXB.jpeg

[–] 0 pt (edited )

The un put sanctions against iraq. They did Israel’s bidding. Rothschilds fund both United Nations and created israel

Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions against Iraq: “We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?” Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: “I think this is a very hard choice, but the price--we think the price is worth it.” --60 Minutes (5/12/96)