WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

477

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

I have life experience

Checkmate, you can put your copypasta where it belongs; on a dusty library shelf

[–] 1 pt

Your life experience is anecdotal which makes it a logical fallacy. I could spend my whole life in Japan and not know anything about California. Doesn’t mean that I know more than a person who grew up in California who is younger than me

[–] 0 pt

Ok you to play kid?

Let's play.

Let's put you in a cage fight against a 6ft tall 254 lbs dumb ass nigger, and let's see how long you'll survive with your superior intelligence.

I give you 30 secs, given that you can run that long to begin with

You want another example? It's may 7 1954, you're part of the french expeditionary corps dropped over dien bien phu, and you're the smartest kid around

Now what? You think just because you're the smartest kid you have the highest odds of survival?

Laughable

[–] 1 pt

In general intelligence is key when it comes to someone’s success in life. If someone is born retarded, they aren’t going to go as far as someone who is of a superior intellect. Obviously smart people do get shot by less intelligent people but ‘in general’ we see that intelligence determines success in life

[–] 1 pt

But we arent in a cage you stupid cunt. We are on a planet and intelligence will build a fucking bomb and blow up the niggers while theyre still trying to learn to tie the knots necessary to build the poorly built cage that could likely be escaped anyway.

[–] 0 pt

Is this a real reply. Like do you think youve made a point that is anything other than a proof that you understand nothing?

[–] 0 pt

You both fail to consider the context

Your superior intelligence is only useful in a setting where intelligence is key

You fucking pseudo intellectuals are jokes, life isn't academia nor a controlled environment

[–] 1 pt

Intelligence will always beat stupidity. You may not value it but the harsh realities of life do.

[–] 0 pt

Does a scientist use life experience or trials when coming to a conclusion ? Yes one might be wise in a lot of areas but that doesn’t mean they know everything

[–] 1 pt

I just cant believe he basically said "my personal experiences outweight any amount of data a person could gather"