There's "no proof" of election fraud either, if you choose to ignore and dismiss it.
There's "no proof" of election fraud either, if you choose to ignore and dismiss it.
Well that's nothing but unadulterated bullshit. How old are you? Let me guess a fully indoctrinated college student. Look how stupid you are and don't talk to me.
I DON'T SUFFER FOOLS KINDLY.
Well that's nothing but unadulterated bullshit. How old are you? Let me guess a fully indoctrinated college student. Look how stupid you are and don't talk to me.
I DON'T SUFFER FOOLS KINDLY.
Wait what? I read your post wrong. Sorry for my previous comment.
Wait what? I read your post wrong. Sorry for my previous comment.
I'm saying that proof isn't persuasive. Just existing doesn't make people see it, just seeing it doesn't make people understand it. In that sense, we are all flat-earthers to some degree.
I'm saying that proof isn't persuasive. Just existing doesn't make people see it, just seeing it doesn't make people understand it. In that sense, we are *all* flat-earthers to some degree.
(post is archived)