![How the turns table [828x1018 - 101KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/zi6zy1.jpg){kind=link}
Evolution is a false narrative.
It's so ridiculous.
Humans came from monkey's? Then why are there still monkey's?
Evolution has its moments honestly. It does make sense, but one should be wary of outright believing it. There are still many elements of evolution that cant be explained
Exactly, read "Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution" by biochemist Michael J. Behe to understand that evolution happens but CAN NOT be solely based on random variation. There are too many biochemical complexities that could only line up if there is a force guiding evolution.
I never undersood the meme that one can not understand evolution and be christian at the same time. Most if not all the early founders of the field were christian anyways ... just like the church bankrolled the scientific period after the dark ages, something atheists and kikes conveniently forget to mention, they always harp on the one guy somewhere who was persecuted for political reasons somewhere in bumbling nowhere
"You came from your great-grandfather?
Then why do your cousins still exist?
Checkmate, evolutionists!"
You only misunderstand evolution. There's no one who actually disbelieves it, just some who continuously and/or deliberately misunderstand it. You can live and breed without understanding it, so it's not that important, but you can never understand culture or memes without understanding evolution.
Don't feel bad, I rejected evolution for most of my youth. I could walk you through your misunderstanding, but that sounds like a poor use of my time.
Science doesn't support darwinian evolution in the slightest.
I believe adaptation exists, as in a bird can change it's beak, but a bird can't turn into an elephant.
A fish will always be a fish.
You know why I know. Because of the mosquito experiment where they tried to prove evolution exists.
Guess what? They couldn't. They could only make adaptations happen, but they couldn't get the mosquitos to "evolve" into anything other than a mosquito.
No one's saying you can make a branch of the tree of life into another branch. But you can make a branch split. Eventually you have two different breeds of mosquitoes that can't interbreed. That's a new species. But no, you can't turn a housefly into a potato through the breeding process, and evolution never claimed such a thing was possible.
You're reinforcing my point that you only "disbelieve" it because you fail to understand it. You have no opinion on the theory of evolution. Only an opinion on some creationist strawman version, not the actual theory.
Evolution is a biological fact. You can see bacteria and viruses, and even many insect populations change on the timescale of the lab.
That said, the stochastic creation of life from inorganic compounds, however, is pure fiction. Additionally, humans were crafted by God, starting with Adam and Eve. It's painfully obvious if you look at "mythologies" and archeology of our forefathers.
Microevolution is a fact - but what isn't a fact is that it results in gradual speciation events, rather than just minor change in species over time. Darwinian evolution is a different claim, and it assumes a much larger explanatory domain. Macroevolution presents some substantial problems for Darwinism. Of course, today we have theories in the post-Gould era that are elaborations on the 'punctuated equilibrium' concept. There are still some difficult philosophical challenges with evolution even in its most contemporary forms. The relative stasis within species across massive time spans is difficult to explain on a Darwinian account. Punctuated equilibrium was a theory that emerged as a way to tackle the problem of stasis, but you find that some of the prominent, tried-and-true Darwinists (like Dawkins) will gripe about PE because it is not nearly as implicitly atheistic as Darwinism is - and as opposed to being correct about change in species across time, Darwinists demonstrate their more pressing priority is their commitment to keeping God out of nature.
Convergent evolution explains the stability of certain forms. Certain things work better in any given environment. Large environmental shifts or long-term genetic drift "inspire" new adaptations.
You're seeing adaptation, not evolution.
A bird can change it's beak, but it can't turn into an alligator.
Explain niggers.
Sub-Saharan had no environmental pressures on them to become intelligent and form cooperative societies.
Europeans did, middle easterners did, even north Africans did, and whites are indigenous to all these places.
Now you explain, why did God put niggers on the planet?
That was my question. If there was no evolution why are niggers a thing? What was "gods" plan for them?
Theyre remnants of the global war. Essentially fighting clones made by aliens. "The beasts of the field."
The bhagavad gita describes it pretty well.
(post is archived)