You are cherry picking topics and shifting argument, just like a vegetarian jew might.
Yes, we all know vinclozolin (a crop fungicide used on soy) has been proven in mammals to screw with virility, and create deformed shrunken penises in lab rats... : https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17905137/
and :
In an experiment involving pregnant mice, hypospadias was observed in approximately 1 of 4 mice that were fed a diet comprising genistein soy isoflavones, but was NOT observed in a control group with a soya-free diet."
25 fucking percent of the males had shrunken deformed penises!
Pregnant mice fed soy are absolutely proven to create small deformed penises.
Questionnaires of mothers in english hospitals show similar correlations.
Soy has ruined your mind of critical thinking skills, and you probably now masturbate to Tranny porn.
I'm shifting arguments by taking the sources YOU provided, the claims YOU made, and showing how they are complete bullshit? Lmfao.
I'm not arguing about what soy does or doesn't do, I have no fucking idea. What I am saying is I actually clicked on your links and read them compared to what you're saying and it's laughably retarded. You stacking more shitty research on top doesn't change the fact that you provided horrible sources that don't support your claims at all. I'm not going to play your game where you just throw away your old shitty sources and produce new shitty sources. You made retarded claims with retarded sources, you're refusing to own it, and no new studies will change that.
Like I said I have no desire to critique the rest of your claims since it's abundantly clear you're either a complete dumbass, a liar, or both. Why would I do that? "Oh this person is clearly a fucking idiot let me just continue engaging with them in the hopes eventually they say something smart" 😂
It's called "credibility" like if I say "mice are actually space creatures from another dimension" people aren't particularly compelled to listen to the rest of the shit I have to say because it's already clear I'm a moron.
"In an experiment involving pregnant mice, hypospadias was observed in approximately 1 of 4 mice that were fed a diet comprising genistein soy isoflavones, but was NOT observed in a control group with a soya-free diet."
https://files.catbox.moe/3fd0gg.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.05.004
What does this have to do with the shitty evidence you presented in your first post? You refuse to admit how awful your initial "research" was. So now you expect me to critique your new shitty evidence and then if I debunk that, then what? You throw that away too and just continue producing more? This is more of a war of attrition than a discussion.
(post is archived)