"In an experiment involving pregnant mice, hypospadias was observed in approximately 1 of 4 mice that were fed a diet comprising genistein soy isoflavones, but was NOT observed in a control group with a soya-free diet."
https://files.catbox.moe/3fd0gg.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.05.004
> "In an experiment involving pregnant mice, **hypospadias was observed in approximately 1 of 4 mice that were fed a diet comprising genistein soy isoflavones**, but was NOT observed in a control group with a soya-free diet."
https://files.catbox.moe/3fd0gg.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.05.004
What does this have to do with the shitty evidence you presented in your first post? You refuse to admit how awful your initial "research" was. So now you expect me to critique your new shitty evidence and then if I debunk that, then what? You throw that away too and just continue producing more? This is more of a war of attrition than a discussion.
What does this have to do with the shitty evidence you presented in your first post? You refuse to admit how awful your initial "research" was. So now you expect me to critique your new shitty evidence and then if I debunk that, then what? You throw that away too and just continue producing more? This is more of a war of attrition than a discussion.
(post is archived)