![Banking is serious business [724x289 - 252KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/6DTnoD.png){kind=link}
Arab governments have been comprimised for the longest time, if they all were legitimately opposed to Israel, they would have called for the unification of all Arab states against Israel and Israel would have been gone the next hour.
Exactly. There isn't even talk of unification and that is bizarre.
The whole point of the war in the middle east is to break them up into smaller countries that fight eachother along ethnic lines. The odid yinon plan
That is exactly why israel wanted Iraq broken into three pieces. Israel said openly that they will be easier to control that way.
The British created the current countries after WW1 so the ruling lines are puppets of the Rothschilds.
That's because anyone who speaks of that will be assasinated, their countries will become destabilized (Arab Spring), or just outright invaded and destroyed via US military (Iraq and Afghanistan's "War on Terror"). Without U.S financial and military support, Israel will get crushed, and they know it. They already tried unification against Israel, but the U.S/West came in to save the day.
They tried In the arab-israeli war.
Oh please, that was barely a real attempt. They barely mustered up a fighting force nearing 100k, the high estimates of troops that the Arabs had is said to have been 63,500 when they could've mustered up millions of fighters. Arab's were also divided because of inter-Arab political rivalries that were engaged in different agendas, different interests and had often conflicting goals. So no, this can not be cited as an example of a unified force against Israel at all.
Agreed but don't forget that Israel fired first.
Yea sounds like they could have done better but Arabs have psyops and Isis to deal with that are funded by the CIA and mossad
(post is archived)