WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

560

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Madonna has those things

No, she does not. Madonna has no security as she has no stability. That's why she has mental breakdowns on stage that involve ripping the clothes off of a younger women in front of thousands, adopting diversity from the third world, addition to questionable plastic surgery, and embarrassingly raping a famous up and coming black guy so hard that he never recovered and I actually feel kinda bad for him.

Katy Perry, another insecure and neurotic hag, did a similar public rape of a young boy.

Jews

This is Poal so sometimes I take some knowledge among the posters for granted. Since that looks to have been an error on my part, I'll remind you that King David and King Solomon were not Jews.

Of course the jews havent “caused” it.

Of course they have. Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya etc were all far more stable before Jews meddled.

The hasidics around here try to do 8 often and a huge amount of their kids are retarded. They are also all on welfare.

Because hasidics are functionally retarded. These are the kinfolk of the idiots who, much to General Patton's dismay, refused to learn to use a toilet.

What are you offering women to get back in the home and have more kids?

You know those memes of the USA prior to the mid 1950s, the ones where everything was grand? That's what we're offering a return to. The so-memed "Wheat Field World".

Here's the crux of the issue: if women aren't going to be the homemakers who produce progeny then all that they are ever going to get are one night stands, until they aren't even fit for that. Women only have about a 20 year window to set themselves up for a fulfilling life. Once that window closes, and women can close it prematurely by being thots, then it is a one-way trip to a living purgatory filled with boxed wine, cats, and dykery for them as they slog out a miserable, unfulfilled existence sustained only by popping prescription drugs (eg:SSRIs).

[–] 0 pt

No, she does not. Madonna has no security as she has no stability. That's why she has mental breakdowns on stage that involve ripping the clothes off of a younger women in front of thousands,

She has as much as Mel’s whores have, she has money. Mel’s whores dont have emotional stability, they are married to Mel the manic depressive alcoholic. We’ve all seen and heard his mental breakdowns. Even Katy Perry would appear to have more stability than Mel. Wow. Those poor hookers are at the mercy of his drug addled vicissitudes. FAIL.

I'll remind you that King David and King Solomon were not Jews.

Oh, they’re known by different names at different time but these are the descendents of that gang and the hyksos who infiltrated and ruled egypt before they were thrown out. Later they infiltrated and destroyed Rome. Same folks.

You’re going to contrive whatever twisted narrative you need to to justify that your religion isn’t another one of their con-jobs, but Im not conflicted.

Because hasidics are functionally retarded.

No they aren’t . Guess you don’t know any. I know what Patton said. Lice has nothing to do with IQ. They are smarter than you goy, and they’ve proven it over and over and over. Do not underestimate them.

You know those memes of the USA prior to the mid 1950s,

No you’re not, you’re offering polygamy. Disgusting.

Here's the crux of the issue: if white men dont want to be monogamous, whats the point in being white? No thanks.

Women only have about a 20 year window to set themselves up for a fulfilling life

Being a whore in Mel’s harem isnt fulfilling. That’s the whole point. He makes boxed wine purgatory look good. Cat lady with a pension looks good compared to Burka world.

Monogamy is a hi IQ strategy, an evolutionary r-strategy—polygamy is K-strategy which is why the only ones who do it are gorillas and primitive tribes with low IQs. With polygamy you are selecting for traits like golddigging/whoring, male on male violence, less resources for children to be raised on, infanticide, and low IQ. You are choosing to have a high number of incels. You are choosing a society in which you are selecting for women with the most “trophy wife” qualities— lack of loyalty, goes for the highest bidder, monetization of the fuck. Because in polygamy, the male is only good for his dna and his resources. You wont get any attention or help raising children from the polygamist. They are useless in those regards. How much time does Mel spend with any single one of those kids? Zippo. He is a paycheck. Why do you think middle-easterners are so mercenary and dishonest?

White females are not on this Earth to satisfy white males and conceive and raise for them more white males. That is a childish view. White females are on this earth to succeed for themselves within the context of evolution, like all animals on the planet. Loyalty is a two way street. If white men dont want to be loyal to their females, they have no expectation for that loyalty to be returned. None.

The decline of monogamous marriage via the reformation and then jewish reforms to divorce law in the 20th century are responsible for the majoriy of the collapse of the white family. Yes, polygamists like you who thought you could have your cake and eat it do. Oink oink little piggy. The single/divorced/abandon woman with children was the justification for

  1. Child support

  2. Welfare, public housing, food stamps,

  3. Ladies getting careers. Men demanded the right to abandon their wives legally and run off with their secretary, which was why all girls were told to have careers.

Women now have lots of choices. So tell me why they would choose an economically and morally worse choice ? They wouldnt. They wont. White men have monogamy to offer. Thats their appeal. Play to your strengths guy.

Or you could do what a lot of white men have done and find a low IQ mud woman to take your shit deal. The world is full of those sort of mutts. You want the genetic gold for your kids, you will need to bring more to the table. Monogamy.

[–] 0 pt

Mel’s whores dont have emotional stability

"Emotional stability"? No, we're talking about actual stability, the kind that gives everything that a woman is beholden to biology to seek out. Emotional Stability is something that no woman wants, because any woman who gets it cheats on the man who provides it as he is "boring". Men are supposed to be stable in their emotions themselves, but women need to ride the emotional rollercoaster as part of their fulfillment.

Monogamy is a hi IQ strategy, an evolutionary r-strategy—polygamy is K-strategy

Not quite, being a nigger-tier "baby daddy" a dozen times over is a K strategy. Bona fide polygamy would be a R strategy as all the children born from it would be provided for. I can agree that monogamy should be the way, but it inevitably winds up with virile men sitting on the sidelines of reproduction after their wife dries up. That has proven to be a disaster as it furthers White Genocide.

White females are not on this Earth to satisfy white males and conceive and raise for them more white males. That is a childish view.

If "childish" means "truthful, as God intended, and 'the production of more children to prevent White Genocide'", as I trust your intention was, then yes.

The decline of monogamous marriage via the reformation and then jewish reforms

Yet you were telling me that it wasn't the Jews just a few posts back. How can this be?

Your logic on women having careers is backwards: men only started banging in the workplace because women were (((ushered))) into the workplace. Historically, women did not want to work in the workplace, and men did not want them to work in the workplace. If men gave an honest poll, none of them would want women in the workplace even now.

If you're a married man and your wife works, then you're pimping her out.