> Paragraph 9, sentence 2. It says that does it? Lets find out. > You can see one on a billboard in the background of the last scene of Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger’s 1943 film, The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp, when the ageing, reactionary but charming soldier finds his house in Belgravia bombed. Talk about reading between the lines. You mean this sentence instead? > Possibly, this was because it was considered less appropriate to the conditions of the blitz than to the mass panic expected in the event of a German ground invasion. So the poster was made to reduce panic and increase production **during** the blitz. It preceded the unlikely event of land invasion seeing as the German airforce was ineffective to make headway into Britain. Your opinion, against all evidence to the contrary and testimony stating that the poster has next to nothing to do with implying the population should just surrender at the first sign of stress as your indicating. It states, *should* this happen, would it work? Not it was made in the event this *would* take place. Read the sentence again, then again, then start over and read it one more time, then probably another time for good luck, then join us at the adults table. Are you familiar with the term supposition? Because you seem to *know* what you clearly don't know.