![Then and Now. [1500x1217 - 505KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/gIaKDp.png){kind=link}
no the part I quoted... you are obviously trying to redirect. I counted the first block of text as paragraph 1, so by you counting paragraph 8...
The specific purpose of the poster was to stiffen resolve in the event of a Nazi invasion, and it was one in a set of three. The two others, which followed the same design principles, were: ...
Emphasis mine.
Mr. Fantastic levels of stretch right there.
So you concede the poster was made during the blitz, for the blitz and predates the unlikely possibility of land invasion which they may or may not re-use the same sentiment of the poster again. Who's initial and only purpose has only ever been used for, and during the blitz as the land invasion never eventuated.
But if the invasion did occur, then the poster being re-issued could reflect your assumption that the design was intended, initially or otherwise that
"Keep calm even though there are invaders occupying your town."
despite the issue of the poster is chronologically incongruent with the courses of events.
Your playing at what if scenarios like there was a parallel world this actually happened in.
No more Red Alert for you.
You argue like a jew. When you are proven wrong with clear evidence in black and white you simply claim victory, ignore the evidence and say you won the argument.
The poster could be used to mean surrender and die ~ BuddhasTorch
But it wasn't.
Imbeciles clutching at straws 101, Jew harder next time you disingenuous clown.
(post is archived)