WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

476

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 9 pts (edited )

another bigoted trailer park myth, if black people were so bad the media would say something but they only have good things to say, and have you seen black in movies? they are nothing but perfect displays of humanity's best values, i wish my dad was black i would be the next einstein by now.

I personally have never lived around them but the world is so connected i don't need to bigot.

[–] 3 pts

Forget the purse. RUN.

Top Kek. And so true.

[–] 1 pt

Add another box to the right, with a head shot of a beat-up white woman. "Too late. You're having a nigglet and he's long gone."

This is the argument that we are all clines. All the Jews from Franz Boas on had there gentile cover to the transformation of the universities to be 'culture' based rather than 'race' based or 'genetic' based.

Cline (biology) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cline_(biology)

Richard C. Lewontin convincing, falsely, that we're only separated by culture.

“The contrast between genetic and environmental, between nature and nurture, is not a contrast between fixed and changeable. It is a fallacy of biological determinism to say that if differences are in the genes, no change can occur.” ― Richard C. Lewontin, Biology as Ideology: The Doctrine of DNA

Franz Boas https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Boas

Margaret Mead https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Mead

Human Genetic Diversity: Lewontin's Fallacy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Genetic_Diversity:_Lewontin%27s_Fallacy

[–] 1 pt

What does that mean in English?

[–] [deleted] 1 pt (edited )

They use clines (gene flow) in such a way make it impossible to say that a circle cannot be drawn around a cluster of like genes in one population can't include genes in another population. This is a matter of which genes are selected, such as only picking the genes that determine variation for fingers, toes, and belly buttons.

This is a another fallacy (but not the lewontin-fallacy). Then they say the science says that all human differences are on continuum or spectrum of gene expression (because we all have eyeballs, toes, and fingers, and that no biological or physical expression is unique to any population. Then they say that since their is no physical appearance or biological difference between an expression in any one human population that can't be found in anther population, then all human differences are just the result of psycho-social differences or 'culture'.

REFUTING A BIGOT: DAVID PAKMAN ON RACE AND IQ https://www.bitchute.com/video/a5muVMrLiso/

A side note is that after Darwin setting the precedent for evolution and genetic based answers to the taxonomy of all living things which was called Scientific Racism. Scientific Racism had some ideas on human genetics that what is the best way to produce the healthiest organism of a species. This became mutated into Joseph Mengele and a 'burn the astronaut' idea of Eugenics, (some of this came earlier some of it came later)

Frans Boas and Margret Mead returned all that all human cultures were equal and were only limited by environment. We get comparisons that the Aztec civilization was greater than Western culture. They became the heads of all Anthropology departments in America which then spawned in the universities later that genetics don't reflect human differences today.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I'd put myself at 0.5 - I have almost entirely 0 visible dark skin genes (if any) besides my brown hair.

[–] 0 pt

Doesn't mention eye colour

Its okay you can call them Hazel

[–] 0 pt

Yes you can say nigger here

[–] 0 pt

I have since come to that conclusion.

[–] 0 pt

I kinda resemble #1 there, and I like leather purses with fringe the most. Maybe it's because they look like my "possibles bag".