WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts

The man is the boss of the house. There are good bosses, shitty bosses, and bosses that let their employees run everything.

Then, like now, those who want women as slaves are fucked in the head.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

Women are the ones that ultimately choose their partner. If you have a shitty ‘boss’ you chose poorly.

[–] 1 pt

The owner of the business I work at is hardly ever there. We run the whole show. And do a pretty damn good job. He basically only does marketing and signs checks. I'm totally fine with it though. Getting real experience for when I do my own venture.

[–] 1 pt

I work on house repair servicing about 28 years. During this time I meet hundreds of families, they differ in education, material - social status, etc. But they have one thing in common. Real boss of the house is woman, wife or girlfriend, no matter. I’ve met tough, confident men, who think they’re the boss of the house... but if a woman wants the walls in the living room to be orange instead of green, in the end somehow it always turns out that the woman's word is the last. btw. I agree with your last sentence. Only couple times meet such family, where man threat woman as "slave", and always this was some weird dude or criminal... or both.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

My 2 cents:

  • Men are good at working.
  • Men are good at moving mountains for their partner.
  • Men are not so good at making things pretty of their own accord, that requires a bit of direction from women.

By this I mean that women are good at making the house look good but men are good at making the changes required to make it look good. Like women have the eye for detail in beauty but men should have the craftsmanship to create it. A good partnership is the communication from articulating how to make things pretty to making them to the specification.

[–] 0 pt

This is just another myth without roots in reality. Let see facts. Woman often do not work, or work easiest job without too much stress. Woman have less obligation to bring bread to the table. So in short they have time and opportunity to think about so "important" stuff like home decoration. Add to this his desire to control everything in family life. Men are much more practical, but if they have time and will they are at least good as woman in making stuff pretty. Do not forget, male are creatives, woman just are pussy carrier.

[–] 1 pt

She is ugly...in every way

[–] 1 pt

I watched that interview with Peterson and really enjoyed it. Have you got a link to the article she wrote post divorce? I feel I would enjoy that too.

[–] 2 pts

You mean this one? https://graziadaily.co.uk/life/real-life/divorce-before-30/

That video randomly came on youtube and so I decided to search if Helen was divorced yet. I was not surprised.

[–] 2 pts

Christ she sounds like an awful woman. It's rare that I say this, but hopefully she'll never reproduce.

[–] 4 pts

I don't think she will, but the way they reproduce isn't sexual, it's ideological.

[–] 1 pt

Thank you for the link. What a piece of work she is. Blamed wedding industry for her big day. Professes to be a feminist whilst pretending to be unaware of the poor hard done by women curriculum 101. Tops it off with the "divorce more equal" crap when women get to keep what really matters - the kids.

[–] 1 pt

Looks like the snakes are eating themselves https://www.thefocus.news/celebrity/helen-lewis-controversy/

[–] 1 pt

The other thing is, this document says it was published in 2020. She's about 37, and she's writing about being younger than 30.

Does she still think she's in her late-20's? And now has she reached her late-30's, single with 1 divorce under her belt already?

[–] 1 pt

I haven't read her article, but I am assuming she didn't like her Husband's reaction to that "talk"?

[–] 5 pts

To be fair, she does blame herself and notes she was more attentive to the legalities of her honeymoon insurance than her status as married.

She said a separation-divorce takes 2-5 years, in which she notes feelings of bitterness.

And yet, divorced she seems more concerned with losing friends, finances, and her google ratings for her married double-barrelled last name than her past relationship.

She seems to think weddings are only about having "the perfect day" with flowers and frilly dresses.

Towards the end she finally writes some small paragraph about her husband, blink and you'd miss it. It's less about him but more about noting that he existed. And then she runs off into some feminist propaganda tirade again about how men are evil and divorce 'should be about equality' and women's suffrage in 1912...

To be honest, she's well on her path to being a professor in gender studies with 72 cats.

And then there's the fact she feels the need to post her dirty laundry on-line to generate clicks.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

She seems to think weddings are only about having "the perfect day" with flowers and frilly dresses.

I think this is a great indicator of how your marriage will work out. Women who are all about that single day don't understand marriage at all.

[–] 1 pt

Womp womp.

[–] 1 pt

I can't help but hear "two years later" in that Tom Kenny cartoon French accent.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Funny that I watched this interview , ( debate really), last night. First video of the new year for me. Man was that lady annoying. You can see why Peterson ended up having health problems. It was exhausting watching. He mentioned how he has almost exclusively confrontational interviews. Easy to imagine how that would wear you down. He even looked somewhat battered. Interesting to watch him keep his composure during this disingenuous assault. Stupid broad.

[–] 1 pt

Nothing wrong with traditional gender roles. Also, if you cared at all about your wife and your marriage, you would fight to overcome your differences before just getting a divorce. Nowadays, people get married EXPECTING to get divorced at some point.

[–] 0 pt

I mean... Weren't women second class citizens for most of written history?

[–] 0 pt

In the middle east, yes. They were much more respected in Nordic countries which is probably why divisive feminism is more effective there than in middle eastern religion based regions.

Divorced women are tainted. They're just a little better than whores with herpes