![Meanwhile on Aether [696x873 - 62KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/ncCzoI.png){kind=link}
You're the one who is publicly pushing your beliefs on this forum, so yes it is my business, and I will reply to your posts as I please. It's laughable that you think you have the right to say what you want, but other people don't have the right to reply to you.
The banned post was not against the rules, even according to the most strict interpretation. A 25 year old real woman is not a loli, period.
Why don't you start a new hashtag: #NotAllLolisWhoLookUnderageAreActuallyUnderageAskOPTheAgeBeforeBanning
All images, videos or depictions of any kind that show sexually explicit or suggestive content involving children (whether virtual or real) is strictly prohibited.
cue the jew word twisting about how "virtual" only refers to drawings or how "real" doesn't cover adults that fit the description or gaslight us about how "Hey mister, I want some dick" with that thumbnail doesn't pass for loli. What else? he was "just trolling"?
I agree it was suggestive, I never said otherwise.
But she is not a child. No amount of kvetching over "virtual" is going to change that. An adult does not magically become a child just because you take a photograph of them. You are literally using SJW logic here, my dude.
Like I said, even the most strict possible interpretation cannot possibly say that a 25 year old real woman violates the rules. You're just a delusional liar.
This is the post from : https://pic8.co/sh/Nhhyhv.png
full thread: https://files.catbox.moe/yg6mmg.png
From all places he chose that board and every pedo faggot here went to work gaslighting everyone about the rules and "muh 25 years", it's an obvious attempt at pushing the boundaries.
Don't even get me started on the people in that thread, most of them I know are shills from voat, they'll take any opportunity to shit up a board. You're not convincing me or anyone else here.
(post is archived)