![Meanwhile on Aether [696x873 - 62KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/ncCzoI.png){kind=link}
We're not discussing any beliefs, my beliefs are none of your business.
This post is making fun of people trying to bend the rules and complaining after getting punished for it
(((You))) making up quotes and arguing about who likes what age group is a distraction from the simple fact that some idiots can't accept the rules of this site.
I suggest staying in your Aether bubble until you stop viewing shitposts as an attack.
You're the one who is publicly pushing your beliefs on this forum, so yes it is my business, and I will reply to your posts as I please. It's laughable that you think you have the right to say what you want, but other people don't have the right to reply to you.
The banned post was not against the rules, even according to the most strict interpretation. A 25 year old real woman is not a loli, period.
Why don't you start a new hashtag: #NotAllLolisWhoLookUnderageAreActuallyUnderageAskOPTheAgeBeforeBanning
All images, videos or depictions of any kind that show sexually explicit or suggestive content involving children (whether virtual or real) is strictly prohibited.
cue the jew word twisting about how "virtual" only refers to drawings or how "real" doesn't cover adults that fit the description or gaslight us about how "Hey mister, I want some dick" with that thumbnail doesn't pass for loli. What else? he was "just trolling"?
I agree it was suggestive, I never said otherwise.
But she is not a child. No amount of kvetching over "virtual" is going to change that. An adult does not magically become a child just because you take a photograph of them. You are literally using SJW logic here, my dude.
Like I said, even the most strict possible interpretation cannot possibly say that a 25 year old real woman violates the rules. You're just a delusional liar.
(post is archived)