WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

485

I replied to a posting about the French race war and said a war where white people don't fight is really a riot.

This is how it should be. Once white people join the riot, then it turns into a race war. From my perspective, it's better to simply allow a riot to run its course. Turning a riot into a race war allows the kleptocracy to come in and take control. If their pet niggers start rioting, they're in a conundrum because they can't really control their pets and the optics are bad if they try to stop it.

Let it burn!

I replied to a posting about the French race war and said a war where white people don't fight is really a riot. This is how it should be. Once white people join the riot, then it turns into a race war. From my perspective, it's better to simply allow a riot to run its course. Turning a riot into a race war allows the kleptocracy to come in and take control. If their pet niggers start rioting, they're in a conundrum because they can't really control their pets and the optics are bad if they try to stop it. Let it burn!

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

The fire will rise. Unfortunately, there has to be something burning for people to notice the heat and smoke.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Yeah the fire will rise, in a multi ethnic society I believe this...

I think 30% of the french population has at least one parent from extra-european origin, I think that's the real figure, and if it's closer to 20% than 30%, soon enough it will be 30%, being in denial doesn't help. To give you an idea, the white population in the US is little bit less than 60% of the overall population

Now, that being said, anti immigration parties are gaining traction in europe, in every european country, mostly because of criminality, street violence typically, mostly perpetuated by people of extra-european origin, terrorism also fits in that bag, not because of some sort of a sudden racial consciousness revival, we're not there yet

What is very likely, in my opinion, is for the situation to devolve into some sort of brazilian hellscape over time, where the political consensus will mostly revolve around the notion of security, including border security, rather than the notion of race/ethnicity itself, for practical reasons, with the ethnic dimension of the problem being implied, because of decades of failed pro immigration policies and failed assimilation, producing most of today's society security concerns

So in the end, it's more likely to see a pinochet arise, rather than an hitler. A civnat dictator rather than an ethnat one, IMO