Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

"I'm moving after living 6 years in a neighborhood full of "Nahel". If I hadn't had this opportunity to move, I don't think I would have survived another 6 months in this hellhole. Living with a lump in our stomachs, having the door of our residence rammed open, having to look down and use our keys as a weapon in case every time we come home, seeing them pee 3m away from our entrance , enduring the late-night screams and kicking soccer balls against our studio wall, being frustrated with the inaction of the police while those assholes literally wrote their drug prices on our wall... My precarious situation would have been 1000 times more bearable without "Nahel".

The worst thing is that 2 years ago, I would have defended them (I confess to having been on the left for years and I regret it bitterly). But it went too far. Knowing that nobody, and especially not the left, would have shed a tear for me if "Nahel" had pushed me to the limit, broke me. Knowing that a good part of France would consider me the incarnation of the antichrist to think that makes me nauseous. Minors or not, these people (I even find it difficult to continue to call them that) are incompatible with the way of life of those who simply want to live in peace. They only know how to destroy, harass and be violent. I didn't shed a single tear for Nahel, and I won't shed any for potential future "victims"."

...

"Nahel" is the name of the little fuck that got shot by the cop, event which triggered the current riots.

Source video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XirIl4hT4JA

"I'm moving after living 6 years in a neighborhood full of "Nahel". If I hadn't had this opportunity to move, I don't think I would have survived another 6 months in this hellhole. Living with a lump in our stomachs, having the door of our residence rammed open, having to look down and use our keys as a weapon in case every time we come home, seeing them pee 3m away from our entrance , enduring the late-night screams and kicking soccer balls against our studio wall, being frustrated with the inaction of the police while those assholes literally wrote their drug prices on our wall... My precarious situation would have been 1000 times more bearable without "Nahel". The worst thing is that 2 years ago, I would have defended them (I confess to having been on the left for years and I regret it bitterly). But it went too far. Knowing that nobody, and especially not the left, would have shed a tear for me if "Nahel" had pushed me to the limit, broke me. Knowing that a good part of France would consider me the incarnation of the antichrist to think that makes me nauseous. Minors or not, these people (I even find it difficult to continue to call them that) are incompatible with the way of life of those who simply want to live in peace. They only know how to destroy, harass and be violent. I didn't shed a single tear for Nahel, and I won't shed any for potential future "victims"." ... "Nahel" is the name of the little fuck that got shot by the cop, event which triggered the current riots. Source video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XirIl4hT4JA

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (20).
[–] • 0 pt

I see I see. Nation socialism is sounding more ideal. It could possibly also just a good stepping stone to restore a republic.

[–] • 0 pt

Yes absolutely.

Take laisse-faire-freemarket-capitalism for instance, the free for all, with sweatshops and child labor no social net no minimum wage no hold barred, a phase through which america and the west in general went through, a long time ago. Well it doesn't have to be perpetual, it can be the startup phase, and when it takes off after 2 or 3 generations, then yeah you ban child labor because it's not desirable in itself in the first place, and also because you can afford it, as in you don't need it anymore.

Now with "laisse-faire-freemarket-capitalism" you might need at some point to add protectionism because, there are economic predators that you NEED to fend off against... You aren't going to allow them to buy up your weapon manufacturing base for instance because you have reasons to suspect that there are room for malevolence behind that move...

Now, you don't necessarily need the raw part of "laisse-faire-freemarket-capitalism" (child labor sweat shop) when you piss oil everyday... And some regions, it's not even practicable, because there virtually zero resources to exploit, it's far removed from everything and barely anybody wants to go and live over there BUT, you need to hold the place, for strategical and military reasons, so what do you do? Well you subsidies the place, because what else?

[–] • 1 pt

Interesting. But, as Plato said, governments do go through cycles

[–] • 0 pt

Yes, one of the mistakes is to look for the perfect static formula... The flaw is that, just like on a boat sometimes you need to lift the sails but sometimes you need to lower them, completely eventually otherwise they'll get torn apart.

Most western gvt, and most gvt btw, aren't designed to go from minarchism to let's say "socialism" and back... They're all ever expanding with no plan to restructure, scale down at will... They scale down with bankruptcy... When it's too late essentially and there are not enough resources to feed the beast... Why? Well if we put jews and malevolence in general aside, when gvt employees get to vote, they aren't going to vote to lower their pay or to get fired... Of course...