Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

"I'm moving after living 6 years in a neighborhood full of "Nahel". If I hadn't had this opportunity to move, I don't think I would have survived another 6 months in this hellhole. Living with a lump in our stomachs, having the door of our residence rammed open, having to look down and use our keys as a weapon in case every time we come home, seeing them pee 3m away from our entrance , enduring the late-night screams and kicking soccer balls against our studio wall, being frustrated with the inaction of the police while those assholes literally wrote their drug prices on our wall... My precarious situation would have been 1000 times more bearable without "Nahel".

The worst thing is that 2 years ago, I would have defended them (I confess to having been on the left for years and I regret it bitterly). But it went too far. Knowing that nobody, and especially not the left, would have shed a tear for me if "Nahel" had pushed me to the limit, broke me. Knowing that a good part of France would consider me the incarnation of the antichrist to think that makes me nauseous. Minors or not, these people (I even find it difficult to continue to call them that) are incompatible with the way of life of those who simply want to live in peace. They only know how to destroy, harass and be violent. I didn't shed a single tear for Nahel, and I won't shed any for potential future "victims"."

...

"Nahel" is the name of the little fuck that got shot by the cop, event which triggered the current riots.

Source video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XirIl4hT4JA

"I'm moving after living 6 years in a neighborhood full of "Nahel". If I hadn't had this opportunity to move, I don't think I would have survived another 6 months in this hellhole. Living with a lump in our stomachs, having the door of our residence rammed open, having to look down and use our keys as a weapon in case every time we come home, seeing them pee 3m away from our entrance , enduring the late-night screams and kicking soccer balls against our studio wall, being frustrated with the inaction of the police while those assholes literally wrote their drug prices on our wall... My precarious situation would have been 1000 times more bearable without "Nahel". The worst thing is that 2 years ago, I would have defended them (I confess to having been on the left for years and I regret it bitterly). But it went too far. Knowing that nobody, and especially not the left, would have shed a tear for me if "Nahel" had pushed me to the limit, broke me. Knowing that a good part of France would consider me the incarnation of the antichrist to think that makes me nauseous. Minors or not, these people (I even find it difficult to continue to call them that) are incompatible with the way of life of those who simply want to live in peace. They only know how to destroy, harass and be violent. I didn't shed a single tear for Nahel, and I won't shed any for potential future "victims"." ... "Nahel" is the name of the little fuck that got shot by the cop, event which triggered the current riots. Source video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XirIl4hT4JA

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (20).
[–] • 0 pt

I see what you mean, that being said I'm not convinced collectivism always fail, really not. If the US didn't fight the USSR I'm pretty sure it would have taken over the world, no other power was strong enough to stop them back then. And if the US won, it's not thx to its rugged individualism...

Recent history is mostly the visible part of hidden games of power... Don't forget that.

Sparta lasted for about 1000 years, and it was quite collectivist.

[–] • 0 pt

The USSR fell largely due to internal economic issues. Western schools do an absolutely shit job of covering this, largely because Western academics cant read the primary sources in Russian. The short version is that the Soviet budget was so secret only a few people in the country were allowed to see it, because it showed that titanic holes in it were being filled by looting the bank accounts of its citizens. E.g. if your bank statement showed a thousand rubles in your bank account...sure, the statement said that. But it was all spent by the government so by the time the USSR fell it was more like 5 rubles. And not even inflation effery like Western nations do - straight up spent. This made the USSR a house of cards that didnt actually have any savings to backstop emergencies...like the Chernobyl nuclear plant failing. The real disaster there was two-fold: the Soviets had just spent billions of rubles they didnt have on it with no alternate power source available, and their only domestic social orgs not under direct government control were environmentalist groups.

They fostered these environmentalist groups for decades for the sane reason they did so in the West - the watermelons are useful idiots. Until Chernobyl happened, and suddenly they were up to their eyeballs in state-approved protestors who were well organized due to decades of formal state support. And what was the #1 enemy of these protestors all of a sudden? The collectivist government which left them with no power, economic collapse, no way to fix it, and radiation drifting into large cities. Cue the USSR falling over because it could no longer paper over its fuckups.

[–] • 0 pt

The USSR largely failed because of oil price collapse, not because of "internal economic issues."

https://www.rbth.com/history/331825-saudi-arabia-oil-crisis-ussr-collapse

>The Saudi sheiks prospered and quickly gained enormous wealth. This situation was also highly beneficial for the USSR, which increased its oil and natural gas extraction and quickly became one of the world’s leading oil and gas producers: oil and gas income now made up more than half of the national income. Meanwhile, in the US, unemployment rates doubled, and GDP dropped by 6%. But the United States was preparing a counter move by persuading Saudia Arabia to act in US interests. How the US won the Cold War ... Shortly after that in 1986, William Casey, then Director of the US Central Intelligence Agency, went to Saudi Arabia. According to Ronald Reagan’s national security adviser Richard Allen, Casey negotiated with King Fahd what was to occur next. For the six previous years, the Saudi government has been restraining oil prices, sharply decreasing their petroleum extraction; but after Casey returned, in September 1985, Saudi Arabia started rapidly increasing its extraction – even though the prices were still low! Swift drop In four months, Saudi extraction rose from two million to 10 million barrels a day, and prices plummeted from $32 a barrel to $10. For the USSR’s economy - already accustomed to exorbitant incomes from its oil, this was a death blow. in 1986 alone, the USSR lost more than $20 billion (approximately 7.5% of the USSR’s annual income), and it already had a budget deficit.

That's the actual reason

[–] • 1 pt

Have a good book on Casey.