WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

The problem is that it's just a backdoor to further digital surveillance by governments. I'm not defending porn. I'm simply stating that it is a slippery slope when you restrict access to something for moral reasons and give the people in power yet more power. The time-tested solution is having parents instill morals and doing their due diligence about what their kids are doing, watching, and emulating.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

The problem is that the government is controlled by zionist jews that want to breed out and exterminate anyone who won't make a good slave. If we had nationalist governments that weren't infiltrated and corrupted, and were run by ethical Aryans, you could do things like this without it being abused.

[–] 0 pt

That is a good point. I wonder why ethics, debating, and other tools of moral philosophy aren't taught anymore? Could it be that our "betters" want to keep us just poor enough, dumb enough, demoralized enough, and desperate enough to do all the heavy lifting without getting uppity?

[–] 1 pt

This move is only the first step. Pornography is absolutely toxic to any society, and it is eating Western civilization alive. There is a reason we wear clothes, and it isn't the cold. All porn needs to be shut down by the power of the law, if we are to save ourselves from total collapse.,

[–] 1 pt

This is the first step toward digital ID under the guise of protecting children. If France cared about their children it wouldn't be overrun with shitskin rapists.

[–] 0 pt

On one hand less mind corruption for youth On the other hand more govt surveillance

Its opt in, cant say i oppose it even if i hate it. Porn is so easy to get now days, shame kept kids from trying to get a hold of it in the past, now imagine wanting to see boobs but you have to give some creepy govt agency your details. Hopefully it will be enough to destroy some of the industry

[–] 0 pt

It's not the governments job of raising your kids. It's the parents. It reminds me of after 9-11 we lost so much freedom because if you were against anything you support "terrorists". Government has worked out it can eroded our rights on the basis of protecting children. If you're against anything you're a "pedo". And it's obviously working based on some replies

[–] 0 pt

Too little too late

[–] 0 pt

Watch and see who opposes this... pedo scum

[–] 0 pt

People who want to visit these websites will have to install an application for government-licensed digital certification on their mobile phones to prove that they are at least 18 years old.

Personally I'm against the ban. You should read up on it before accusing everyone of being a pedo

[–] 0 pt

They did that in Louisiana at the beginning of the year and you have to verify with some kind of foreign account. Just stopped going to the site. Not going to sign up for even more tracking for something so worthless.