WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.4K

Problem?

Problem?

(post is archived)

[–] 9 pts

They are free to go back to the shithole their ancestors crawled from.

[–] 5 pts (edited )

Yes, the answer is freedom, it's always freedom...

Freedom to get the fuck back to where they came from if they don't like it here... Yeah why not

Problem is that they're fucking parasytes, they screech about their religious obligations, but in reality it's only an excuse to impose their rules. The vast majority of them would stay even if the veil and kippah and kosher and hallal food were banned from public schools for instance, which should be the case btw

Return to monarchy is the only real solution for france, and it's only going to make sense/be possible after the republic falls on its face due to too much contradictions and compromissions... And debt. Arbitrary and discriminatory divine/royal decrees, what else? Seriously. There isn't a single western country that is adequately equipped to confront the issue at hand here, legally speaking.

[–] 5 pts

This makes me like her more. Religious slaughtered meat is satanic and results in firing or laying off non muslims.

Australia and New Zealand meat is ALL suspect because of this.

[–] 5 pts

This will be the start of the campaign against her. Watch, this will grow quickly.

[–] 4 pts

The campaign against her has been started since forever

How do you think Macron got elected ?

We the people are the problem, we are quite stupid

Some of us see the truth, we are too few

[–] 1 pt

I honestly cant tell if elections are unfair or if people are that fucking retarded and im not sure which conspiracy i prefer.

If for example america voted for biden for reals then they deserve the hell they are creating. If not then there are significantly more americans against what is happening yet doing nothing about it.

[–] 1 pt

Easy, elections are both "peddled" by the TV + newspapers + social media

AND

are also tampered with

You need to read again "the protocols of elders of zion"....

[–] 4 pts

There is already a significant force against her. They are piling it on now though.

[–] 2 pts

Exactly. If the White French actually voted to return France to its heritage, that would be one thing. But, to many frogs Think racial mixing is a good thing, and diversity is the betterment of society.

[–] 4 pts (edited )

So in the end as you can see you have kikes teaming up with muzzies

They only have a territorial dispute over a beach in the middle east, there are no ideological or theological incompatibilities between the two...

Muslims secretly wish they were jews, that's the irony, they try to emulate jews whenever they can. Problem is that they have a deficit of grey matter. Of course you have smart muslims but I'm talking about the masses here

Muslims compensate their lack of smart by sheer violence and brutality, they are the "broom of the jews" https://www.jewworldorder.org/rabbi-admits-islam-is-israels-broom/ , and this isn't new, think of the so called "golden age of jews" in europe, when muslims invaded spain and jews became their komissars...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_age_of_Jewish_culture_in_Spain

The golden age of Jewish culture in Spain, which coincided with the Middle Ages in Europe, was a period of Muslim rule during which, intermittently, Jews were generally accepted in society and Jewish religious, cultural, and economic life flourished.

The nature and length of this "Golden Age" has been debated, as there were at least three periods during which non-Muslims were oppressed. A few scholars give the start of the Golden Age as 711–718, the Muslim conquest of Iberia. Others date it from 912, during the rule of Abd al-Rahman III. The end of the age is variously given as 1031, when the Caliphate of Córdoba ended; 1066, the date of the Granada massacre; 1090, when the Almoravids invaded; or the mid-12th century, when the Almohads invaded.

[–] 2 pts

"broom of the jews"

Very interesting. Knew they were a tool, butg had not heard of this before.

[–] 3 pts

What will they do when they find out that some chemists working at water treatment plants in North America have been adding liquified porcine extract, basically "pig juice", to the potable water supply for major metropolitan areas?

Of course, that's just a rumor. Don't spread it. It might make some jews and muslims want to leave.

[–] 2 pts

Oh man, is that all it took this whole time!?

[–] 2 pts

Beware of deconstructing traditions, because you may miss reasons why that tradition benefited the society that maintained it. Keeping traditions is conservativism.

The Jewish tradition behind kosher slaughter isn't really a ritual like halal slaughter is. It's essentially based on a fear of consuming blood. The modern interpretation of it is a bit strange; ancient Israel didn't turn cows upside down so they'd bleed out easier. I don't think they did it for smaller animals either. Might've done it for poultry.

I haven't seen anything about practical reasons why you'd want to avoid consuming blood. (Unless you want to flush out the vampires in your community...) Might've made meat less likely to spoil perhaps. It could have been the personal preference of the rabbis in some early Jewish community. It might've had health benefits to not consume blood in the past; there might still be reasons to avoid it. I don't know.

The "stunning" method seems to be more humane than slitting an animal's throat, within limits, at least using modern methods. (The old stunning method, where you basically hit the animal with a sledgehammer, was more problematic.) I've heard of issues where the procedure wasn't performed competently, where the air gun wasn't applied properly and left the animal in serious pain. Those appear to be edge cases. I don't know if the end result is meat with more blood left in it, when the air gun kills the animal outright instead of letting it bleed out, or if Jews are just being pedantic about it.

Halal slaughter is similar to kosher slaughter in that the animal's throat is cut and that Muslims are prohibited from consuming blood. The main difference is it requires someone to pray over the animal as it's slaughtered, which makes the "ritual" label more legitimate.

[–] 0 pt

Muzzies also believe that it's best to kill an animal when it "blood is up" so to say. They say it makes the meat taste better.

[–] 1 pt

Could it really be THAT easy to purge the jew and islamaholic infestations?

[–] 1 pt

They're free to leave.

Bye, Felicia.

[–] 1 pt

As it should be -fuck islam and fuck the joo